Improving the Clinical Value of Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate by Reporting All Values: A Contrarian Viewpoint

被引:2
|
作者
Toffaletti, John G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Clin Labs, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE | 2010年 / 115卷 / 03期
关键词
Renal function; Creatinine blood; Glomerular filtration rate; Cystatin C; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; SERUM CREATININE; RENAL-FUNCTION; COCKCROFT-GAULT; CYSTATIN-C; CLEARANCE; EQUATIONS; DIET; PERFORMANCE; IOTHALAMATE;
D O I
10.1159/000313030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The serious limitations of the estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) appear related not to a shortcoming of the equation, but to the futility of trying to force agreement between two inherently different parameters: a blood marker of kidney function with a very stable concentration (creatinine) and a renal filtration parameter that fluctuates continually (glomerular filtration rate, GFR). Although GFR is regarded as the ultimate determinant of kidney function, it may be less ideal as an early clinical marker to detect declining kidney function. Another shortcoming of GFR is that it has significant overlap between health and kidney disease states categorized according to stage I, II, etc. Serum creatinine has a real and measurable increase as kidney function declines, but this is often masked when creatinine is plotted on a scale of 1.0 mg/dl (88 mu mol/l), which is well above the detection limit of modern creatinine methods of about 0.05 mg/dl. A new equation to estimate GFR, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation, modestly improves accuracy from 80.6% of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease eGFRs being within 30% of the measured GFR, to 84.1% of the CKD-EPI eGFRs being within 30% of the measured GFR. Creatinine methods have recently been standardized to an isotope dilution mass stectrometry reference method. While this will lessen the systematic bias between methods, it will have no effect on either the imprecision of a particular creatinine method or on the inherent random differences between serum creatinine (or eGFR) and actual GFR. Finally, the eGFR is not recommended for reporting until it is well below a reference range for those with no kidney disease. However, if the eGFR were properly regarded as an age-, gender-, and race-adjusted serum creatinine, it could be reported at all values and become a more clinically useful parameter. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:C177 / C181
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Performance Over Time of Four Creatinine-Based Formulas
    Buron, Fanny
    Hadj-Aissa, Aoumer
    Dubourg, Laurence
    Morelon, Emmanuel
    Steghens, Jean-Paul
    Ducher, Michel
    Fauvel, Jean-Pierre
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 92 (09) : 1005 - 1011
  • [42] Estimating glomerular filtration rate for the full age spectrum from serum creatinine and cystatin C
    Pottel, Hans
    Delanaye, Pierre
    Schaeffner, Elke
    Dubourg, Laurence
    Eriksen, Bjorn Odvar
    Melsom, Toralf
    Lamb, Edmund J.
    Rule, Andrew D.
    Turner, Stephen T.
    Glassock, Richard J.
    De Souza, Vandrea
    Selistre, Luciano
    Goffin, Karolien
    Pauwels, Steven
    Mariat, Christophe
    Flamant, Martin
    Ebert, Natalie
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 32 (03) : 497 - 507
  • [43] Clinical value of serum cystatin C by ELISA for estimation of glomerular filtration rate
    Xu, XH
    Zou, JZ
    Ding, XQ
    Xin, DG
    Ren, YS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2004, 18 (02) : 61 - 64
  • [44] Use of glomerular filtration rate estimating equations for drug dosing in HIV-positive patients
    Okparavero, Aghogho A.
    Tighiouart, Hocine
    Krishnasami, Zipporah
    Wyatt, Christina M.
    Graham, Hiba
    Hellinger, James
    Inker, Lesley A.
    ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2013, 18 (06) : 793 - 802
  • [45] The Impact of Reporting Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
    Geara, Abdallah Sassine
    Azzi, Nadine
    Ghimire, Pratima
    Abdallah, Marie
    Siddiqui, Ayesha
    Bassil, Claude
    El-Sayegh, Suzanne
    RENAL FAILURE, 2011, 33 (05) : 486 - 488
  • [46] Clinical usefulness of serum cystatin C and the pertinent estimation of glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C
    Cha, Ran-Hui
    Lee, Chung Sik
    Lim, Youn-Hee
    Kim, Ho
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Yu, Kyung Sang
    Kim, Yon Su
    NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 15 (08) : 768 - 776
  • [47] Performance of creatinine and cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in a European HIV-positive cohort
    Gagneux-Brunon, Amandine
    Delanaye, Pierre
    Maillard, Nicolas
    Fresard, Anne
    Basset, Thierry
    Alamartine, Eric
    Lucht, Frederic
    Pottel, Hans
    Mariat, Christophe
    AIDS, 2013, 27 (10) : 1573 - 1581
  • [48] The diagnostic value of rescaled renal biomarkers serum creatinine and serum cystatin C and their relation with measured glomerular filtration rate
    Pottel, Hans
    Dubourg, Laurence
    Schaeffner, Elke
    Eriksen, Bjorn Odvar
    Melsom, Toralf
    Lamb, Edmund J.
    Rule, Andrew D.
    Turner, Stephen T.
    Glassock, Richard J.
    De Souza, Vandrea
    Selistre, Luciano
    Goffin, Karolien
    Pauwels, Steven
    Mariat, Christophe
    Flamant, Martin
    Bevec, Sebastjan
    Delanaye, Pierre
    Ebert, Natalie
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2017, 471 : 164 - 170
  • [49] Current equations estimating glomerular filtration rate in primary care: Comparison and determinants
    Dehnen, Dorothea
    Quellmann, Thomas
    Herget-Rosenthal, Stefan
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 46 (06): : 448 - 453
  • [50] Estimating glomerular filtration rate in diabetes: a comparison of cystatin-C- and creatinine-based methods
    MacIsaac, RJ
    Tsalamandris, C
    Thomas, MC
    Premaratne, E
    Panagiotopoulos, S
    Smith, TJ
    Poon, A
    Jenkins, MA
    Ratnaike, SI
    Power, DA
    Jerums, G
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 (07) : 1686 - 1689