Impact of the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease on Outcomes After Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

被引:20
|
作者
Kim, Young-Hak
Park, Duk-Woo
Kim, Won-Jang
Lee, Jong-Young
Yun, Sung-Cheol [2 ]
Kang, Soo-Jin
Lee, Seung-Whan
Lee, Cheol Whan
Hong, Myeong-Ki
Park, Seong-Wook
Park, Seung-Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Cardiol, Cardiac Ctr,Asan Med Ctr, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Div Biostat,Ctr Med Res & Informat, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
stent; coronary artery bypass graft; coronary artery disease; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP; BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY; LONG-TERM MORTALITY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; OFF-LABEL; INTERVENTION; IMPLANTATION; ANGIOPLASTY; THROMBOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.094
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study was designed to examine the impact of the extent of coronary disease on long-term outcomes after coronary stenting or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. Background The differential outcome of ULMCA revascularization according to the coronary involvement remains uncertain. Methods From the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty versus Surgical Revascularization) registry, 2,240 patients with ULMCA stenosis who underwent either stenting or CABG were stratified by number of diseased vessels. Results Following adjustment with EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation), diabetes mellitus, and bifurcation stenosis, stents and CABG had similar risks of death and major adverse cardiac events including death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke in all subgroups regardless of the number of diseased vessels over 4 years. In patients with 2-vessel (23.0% vs. 14.2%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.739; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.171 to 2.582; p = 0.006) or 3-vessel (25.0% vs. 17.6%; HR: 1.493; 95% CI: 1.096 to 2.035; p = 0.011) disease, however, stenting was associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events including major adverse cardiac events or target vessel revascularization than CABG. Interaction of vascular involvement with type of stenting or CABG was not significant. Conclusions Stenting appears to be a safe alternative to CABG in patients having ULMCA stenosis combined with additional vascular disease. The advantage of CABG over stenting lies principally in the reduction of repeat revascularization across subgroups stratified by the number of diseased vessels. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2544-52) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:2544 / 2552
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: Strategy selection and systematic risk assessment
    Palmerini, Tullio
    Alessi, Laura
    Dangas, George
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 80 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [22] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis
    Wang, Zhenzhen
    Zhan, Biming
    Bao, Huihui
    Huang, Xiao
    Wu, Yanqing
    Liang, Qian
    Zhang, Weifang
    Jiang, Long
    Cheng, Xiaoshu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 357 (03) : 230 - 241
  • [23] Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Won-Jang
    Suh, Jon
    Yun, Sung-Cheol
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    Lee, Jae-Hwan
    Park, Seong-Wook
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (03) : 167 - 177
  • [24] Long-Term Prognostic Impact of Restenosis of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Requiring Repeat Revascularization
    Wiebe, Jens
    Kuna, Constantin
    Ibrahim, Tareq
    Loesl, Martin
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Kufner, Sebastian
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Richardt, Gert
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Kastrati, Adnan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (19) : 2266 - 2274
  • [25] Revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: An evolution in clinical decision making
    Kandzari D.E.
    Ormiston J.A.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2011, 13 (5) : 424 - 431
  • [26] Mid-Term Results and Costs of Coronary Artery Bypass vs Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Shimizu, Tsuyoshi
    Ohno, Takayuki
    Ando, Jiro
    Fujita, Hideo
    Nagai, Ryozo
    Motomura, Noboru
    Ono, Minoru
    Kyo, Shunei
    Takamoto, Shinichi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (03) : 449 - 455
  • [27] Outcomes of coronary artery interventions: Comparing coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unprotected left main stenosis
    Crouse, Sarah B.
    Kitko, Lisa A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2014, 26 (02) : 91 - 101
  • [28] Revascularization strategies for left main coronary artery disease: current perspectives
    Elbatarny, Malak
    Cheema, Asim N.
    Mazine, Amine
    Verma, Subodh
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (05) : 548 - 558
  • [29] Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Lee, Pil Hyung
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Chang, Mineok
    Baek, Seunghee
    Yoon, Sung-Han
    Kang, Soo-Jin
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (11) : 1233 - 1246
  • [30] Twelve-year outcomes after revascularization for ostial/shaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery
    Yu, Xian-Peng
    Li, Yu
    He, Ji-Qiang
    Jin, Ze-Ning
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (06) : 338 - 343