Using MLSTM and Multioutput Convolutional LSTM Algorithms for Detecting Anomalous Patterns in Streamed Data of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

被引:22
作者
Alos, Ahmad [1 ]
Dahrouj, Zouhair [1 ]
机构
[1] Higher Inst Appl Sci & Technol, Damascus, Syria
关键词
Logic gates; Autonomous aerial vehicles; Anomaly detection; Computer architecture; Prediction algorithms; Memory management; Data models; Anomaly Detection; Convolutional LSTM; Deep Learning; Fault Detection; LSTM; Machine learning; Neural networks; Sliding window; UAV; DIAGNOSIS; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1109/MAES.2021.3053108
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this article, we present a comparative study of two existing deep learning tools that are used in a novel way to detect anomalies in the streamed data of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Detecting anomalies is very vital to predict potential faults that are caused by hardware and software faults and may prevent the UAV from hazardous accidents. Therefore, we suggest using multiple long short-term memory and multioutput convolutional long short-term memory (LSTM) to detect anomalies in UAV data. LSTM networks attracted many researchers in several domains, as it is a useful tool for learning dynamic temporal patterns and long-range dependencies in sequential data, which cannot be achieved using traditional neural networks. However, utilizing multiple LSTM networks would result in too much redundancy. The redundancy issue can be solved by incorporating one convolutional LSTM (ConvLSTM) network with multiple outputs. The ConvLSTM is suitable for analyzing multivariate temporal data; due to its convolutional architecture and the advantage of preserving the benefits of the LSTM networks. We evaluated and compared the two approaches using well-known indicators such as the detection rate, the false alarm rate, the precision, and the F.score indicators. The two methods exhibited promising results in predicting different types of faults, for instance (sensor-impulse and sensor-cut). However, the multioutput ConvLSTM was faster in training and testing phases, and its results were superior in predicting (sensor-stuck and sensor-drift) faults.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 15
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Althubiti SA, 2018, 2018 28TH INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (ITNAC), P293
[2]   Integrated method for the UAV navigation sensor anomaly detection [J].
Bu, Jian ;
Sun, Rui ;
Bai, Hongyang ;
Xu, Rui ;
Xie, Fei ;
Zhang, Yucheng ;
Ochieng, Washington Yotto .
IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2017, 11 (05) :847-853
[3]   PCA-based multivariate statistical network monitoring for anomaly detection [J].
Camacho, Jose ;
Perez-Villegas, Alejandro ;
Garcia-Teodoro, Pedro ;
Macia-Fernandez, Gabriel .
COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2016, 59 :118-137
[4]  
Casas P., 2015, ICT15, V15, P1
[5]  
Cork Lennon, 2007, 2007 Information, Decision and Control, P230, DOI 10.1109/IDC.2007.374555
[6]  
Duan Yong, 2017, 2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), P241, DOI 10.1109/ICEMI.2017.8265777
[7]  
Graves A, 2012, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V385, P37
[8]   Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding [J].
Hundman, Kyle ;
Constantinou, Valentino ;
Laporte, Christopher ;
Colwell, Ian ;
Soderstrom, Tom .
KDD'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2018, :387-395
[9]   A sensor-based approach for fault detection and diagnosis for robotic systems [J].
Khalastchi, Eliahu ;
Kalech, Meir .
AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2018, 42 (06) :1231-1248
[10]   Online data-driven anomaly detection in autonomous robots [J].
Khalastchi, Eliahu ;
Kalech, Meir ;
Kaminka, Gal A. ;
Lin, Raz .
KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 43 (03) :657-688