Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Brief Addiction Monitor

被引:9
作者
Gaddy, Melinda A. [1 ]
Casner, Hilary G. [2 ]
Rosinski, Jenny [1 ]
机构
[1] VA Eastern Kansas Hlth Care Syst, Dwight D Eisenhower VA Med Ctr, Leavenworth, KS 66048 USA
[2] Vet Hlth Care Syst Ozarks, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
关键词
Addiction; Measurement; Structural equation modeling; Veteran; Brief Addiction Monitor; Factor analysis; FIT INDEXES; VETERANS; HEALTH; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsat.2018.04.010
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Substance use disorders (SUDS) are of great concern for health care providers working with military veteran populations. Systematic evaluation of progress and outcomes within the Veterans Affairs (VA) is a critical component of care provided for the veteran population. The Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) is a 17-item instrument used within VA to assess substance use and related constructs among veterans participating in SUD care. Initial evaluations, using a version containing continuous items, suggested that the items form three factors reflecting substance use, risk factors, and protective factors. Subsequent work, using the BAM version containing Likert-style items collected from a single VA Medical Center sample, did not support the proposed 3-factor solution. The current study used a nationwide sample of 4955 veterans to evaluate the factor structure of the BAM and its usefulness over time. Exploratory factor analyses conducted did not provide evidence of the originally proposed BAM factor structure but instead supported a 4-factor model (reflecting alcohol use, stress, risk, and stability) formed from 13 of the items. Further analyses conducted within a structural equation modeling framework showed that the four-factor model exhibited invariance across occasions of measurement, although internal consistency was found to be low for most subscales. Results provide caution against using BAM subscale scores to track treatment outcomes over time.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM)
    Cacciola, John S.
    Alterman, Arthur I.
    DePhilippis, Dominick
    Drapkin, Michelle L.
    Valadez, Charles, Jr.
    Fala, Natalie C.
    Oslin, David
    Mckay, James R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2013, 44 (03) : 256 - 263
  • [2] Center for Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education (CESATE), 2010, BRIEF ADD MON MAN OP
  • [3] Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Defense, 2015, VA DOD CLIN PRACT GU VA DOD CLIN PRACT GU
  • [4] Effects of Sample Size, Estimation Methods, and Model Specification on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indexes
    Fan, Xitao
    Thompson, Bruce
    Wang, Lin
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) : 56 - 83
  • [5] Insights From Advanced Analytics At The Veterans Health Administration
    Fihn, Stephan D.
    Francis, Joseph
    Clancy, Carolyn
    Nielson, Christopher
    Nelson, Karin
    Rumsfeld, John
    Cullen, Theresa
    Bates, Jack
    Graham, Gail L.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2014, 33 (07) : 1203 - 1211
  • [6] Progress Monitoring in Mental Health and Addiction Treatment: A Means of Improving Care
    Goodman, Jessica D.
    McKay, James R.
    DePhilippis, Dominick
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 44 (04) : 231 - 246
  • [7] Marriage and relationship closeness as predictors of cocaine and heroin use
    Heinz, Adrienne J.
    Wu, Johnny
    Witkiewitz, Katie
    Epstein, David H.
    Preston, Kenzie L.
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2009, 34 (03) : 258 - 263
  • [8] Kline R.B., 2005, Principals and practice of structural equation modeling, V2nd
  • [9] Little T. D., 2013, LONGITUDINAL STRUCTU
  • [10] Examining the performance of the brief addiction monitor
    Nelson, Karl G.
    Young, Kevin
    Chapman, Heather
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2014, 46 (04) : 472 - 481