Understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Hong Kong

被引:3
|
作者
Hui, Vivian C. C. [1 ]
Li, H. C. [1 ]
Chow, Josh H. K. [1 ]
Ng, Chris S. C. [1 ]
Lui, Constance Y. W. [2 ]
Fung, Jasmine L. F. [3 ]
Mak, Christopher C. Y. [3 ]
Chung, Brian H. Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lau, Kui Kai [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Bachelor Med & Bachelor Surg Program, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Bachelor Nursing Program, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Dept Med, Div Neurol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
decision making; direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC); genetic counseling; genetic literacy; ATTITUDES; AWARENESS; SERVICES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1430
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) is gaining popularity in Hong Kong (HK). As DTCGT forgoes specialist medical involvement, healthcare professionals have raised concerns regarding its validity, utility, and the public's ability to interpret DTCGT results. Thus, genetic counseling (GC) is recommended to facilitate understanding of DTCGT. This study aimed to investigate HK public's perception toward DTCGT and the importance of GC in DTCGT. A total of 304 HK adults were invited to complete a 37-item survey online. Participants' genomic literacy, understanding and attitude toward DTCGT and GC, and responses to a mock DTCGT scenario were assessed. 48% of participants were aware of DTCGT while 82% indicated an interest. 30% of participants were aware of GC services in HK; 49% were interested in GC services for understanding DTCGT results. Participants scored on average 7.6/11 in the genomic sequencing knowledge scale and were weak in limitations of genomic testing. In the mock DTCGT scenario, 73% of participants expressed concern with the positive results initially. After being explained limitations of DTCGT, 40% of participants reported decreased concern. Reduced perceived helpfulness in medical management and lifestyle modification were also reported by 35% and 27%, respectively. This HK population demonstrated a high level of awareness and interest in DTCGT. As potential DTCGT users, they might experience excess concern and overestimate the usefulness of positive DTCGT results, particularly in medical management. The importance of GC to educate and guide interpretation of DTCGT results is supported; yet the awareness and access of GC services is inadequate in HK.
引用
收藏
页码:1640 / 1648
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commodification and marketisation of genetic testing through online direct-to-consumer platforms in Hong Kong
    Zayts, Olga
    Luo, Zhengpeng
    DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATION, 2017, 11 (06) : 630 - 647
  • [2] Perception of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing and Direct-To-Consumer Advertising of Genetic Tests among Members of a Large Managed Care Organization
    Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
    Feigelson, Heather Spencer
    Wagner, Nicole
    Anh Quynh Le
    Halterman, Eve
    Cornish, Nadine
    Dearing, James W.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (03) : 448 - 461
  • [3] Assessing the social impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Understanding sociotechnical architectures
    Parthasarathy, Shobita
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (09) : 544 - 547
  • [4] Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience
    Gollust, Sarah E.
    Gray, Stacy W.
    Carere, Deanna Alexis
    Koenig, Barbara A.
    Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Spector-Bagdady, Kayte
    Wang, Na
    Green, Robert C.
    Roberts, J. Scott
    MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2017, 95 (02) : 291 - 318
  • [5] Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
    Covolo, Loredana
    Rubinelli, Sara
    Ceretti, Elisabetta
    Gelatti, Umberto
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (12)
  • [6] Predictors of interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Sweeny, Kate
    Legg, Angela M.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (10) : 1259 - 1272
  • [7] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk
    Majumder, Mary A.
    Guerrini, Christi J.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 72, 2021, 2021, 72 : 151 - 166
  • [8] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: driving choice?
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Avard, Denise
    Howard, Heidi Carmen
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2010, 10 (08) : 965 - 968
  • [9] Media Coverage of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Lynch, John
    Parrott, Ashley
    Hopkin, Robert J.
    Myers, Melanie
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2011, 20 (05) : 486 - 494
  • [10] Company disclosure and consumer perceptions of the privacy implications of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Christofides, Emily
    O'Doherty, Kieran
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2016, 35 (02) : 101 - 123