Technical performance analysis of a micro-combined cooling, heating and power system based on solar energy and high temperature PEMFC

被引:67
作者
Chang, Huawei [1 ]
Duan, Chen [2 ]
Xu, Xiangxiang [1 ]
Pei, Houchang [3 ]
Shu, Shuiming [1 ]
Tu, Zhengkai [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Second Ship Design & Res Inst, Wuhan 430064, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Polytech Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Wuhan 430048, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CCHP; High temperature PEMFC; Solar energy; Thermal performance; Economic performance; Environmental performance; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; OXIDE FUEL-CELL; WORKING FLUID SELECTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ABSORPTION CHILLER; DRIVEN; HYDROGEN; ORC;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.217
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A solar energy and high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC)-based micro-combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system (named system I) is proposed in this work. This system mainly consists of a PEMFC subsystem, an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) subsystem and a vapor compression cycle (VCC) subsystem. System I would reduce to a high temperature PEMFC-based CCHP system (named system II) if there was no solar energy. With the technical performance analysis models developed, the effects of the current density, operating temperature, solar radiation intensity and ambient temperature on the thermal, economic and environmental performances of the systems are theoretically analyzed. The results show that the current density and solar radiation intensity are the main impact factors that can significantly affect the thermal, economic and environmental performances, while the operating temperature and ambient temperature only have remarkable influences on the thermal performance. The coefficient of performance (COP) of system II is approximately 1.19 in summer and 1.42 in winter, which is always higher than that of system I under the same working conditions. The exergy efficiency of system I and system II are approximately 49.7% and 47.4%, respectively. The primary energy saving rates (PESRs) of system I and system II are 64.9% and 31.8% in summer, and 60.0% and 36.2% in winter, respectively. The payback periods of system I and system II are 9.6 yr and 6.0 yr without government subsidy, respectively. Compared with system II, the pollutant emission reduction rates (ERRs) of system I can be increased by approximately 8.4%-23.5% with the addition of solar energy, which indicates that the development and utilization of clean and renewable energy such as solar energy can significantly reduce pollutant emissions. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21080 / 21089
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Performance of residential fuel-cell-combined heat and power systems for various household types in Japan [J].
Ozawa, Akito ;
Kudoh, Yuki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (32) :15412-15422
[22]   Thermodynamic Analysis of an Integrated SOFC, Solar ORC and Absorption Chiller for Tri-generation Applications [J].
Ozcan, H. ;
Dincer, I. .
FUEL CELLS, 2013, 13 (05) :781-793
[23]   A review: Exergy analysis of PEM and PEM fuel cell based CHP systems [J].
Ozgur, Tayfun ;
Yakaryilmaz, Ali Cem .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (38) :17993-18000
[24]   Thermo-economic analysis of solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle powered cascaded vapor compression-absorption system [J].
Patel, Bhavesh ;
Desai, Nishith B. ;
Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2017, 157 :920-933
[25]   Multi-objective optimization for the operation of distributed energy systems considering economic and environmental aspects [J].
Ren, Hongbo ;
Zhou, Weisheng ;
Nakagami, Ken'ichi ;
Gao, Weijun ;
Wu, Qiong .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (12) :3642-3651
[26]   Energy assessment of PEMFC based MCCHP with absorption chiller for small scale French residential application [J].
Romdhane, Jaouher ;
Louahlia-Gualous, Hasna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (42) :19661-19680
[27]   4E analysis and multi objective optimization of a micro gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell hybrid combined heat and power system [J].
Sanaye, Sepehr ;
Katebi, Arash .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2014, 247 :294-306
[28]   Energy and exergy analyses of various typical solar energy applications: A comprehensive review [J].
Sansaniwal, Sunil Kumar ;
Sharma, Vashimant ;
Mathur, Jyotirmay .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :1576-1601
[29]   Economic feasibility study of a fuel cell-based combined cooling, heating and power system for a data centre [J].
Sevencan, Suat ;
Lindbergh, Goran ;
Lagergren, Carina ;
Alvfors, Per .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 111 :218-223
[30]   Cost targets for domestic fuel cell CHP [J].
Staffell, I. ;
Green, R. ;
Kendall, K. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2008, 181 (02) :339-349