How does sensory processing dysfunction affect play?

被引:53
|
作者
Bundy, Anita C.
Shia, Sue
Qi, Long
Miller, Lucy Jane
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
[2] New Hope Care Ctr, Tracy, CA USA
[3] Future Care Hlth & Management Corp, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Univ Colorado Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Rehabil Med, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Denver, CO USA
[6] KID Fdn, Greenwood Village, CO USA
[7] STAR Ctr, Greenwood Village, CO USA
关键词
pediatric; play; sensory integration; Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT); sensory processing; sensory processing dysfunction (SPD); Short Sensory Profile (SSP); Test of Playfulness (ToP); YOUNG-CHILDREN; PLAYFULNESS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.5014/ajot.61.2.201
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This study investigated sensory processing dysfunction (SPD) and playfulness and the effect of intervention on playfulness. METHOD. Twenty children with SPD and 20 children who were typically developing took the Short Sensory Profile (SSP) and Test of Playfulness (ToP). Children with SPD took the praxis tests from the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT) and received 20 intervention sessions. Correlations among measures and differences between mean scores of groups and pre-intervention and post-intervention were examined. RESULTS. Group ToP scores differed significantly, ToP did not increase post-intervention. Correlations among TOP and SSP ranged from 36 to .72, ToP and SIPT, from -0.1 to -0.46. CONCLUSION. Modulation affects playfulness. Although intervention was not effective, both groups had high scores initially, making the finding difficult to interpret.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 208
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条