Probability density functions based weights for ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators: An example of water quality indices

被引:97
作者
Sadiq, Rehan [1 ]
Tesfamariam, Solomon [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Inst Res Construct, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
关键词
OWA operators; fuzzy; probability density function; water quality index; degree of orness; dispersion;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.041
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper explores the application of ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators to develop water quality index, which incorporates an attitudinal dimension in the aggregation process. The major thrust behind selecting the OWA operator for aggregation of multi-criteria is its capability to encompass a range of operators bounded between minimum and maximum. A new approach for generating OWA weight distributions using probability density functions (PDFs) is proposed in this paper. The basic parameters (mean and standard deviation) of the probability density functions can be determined using the number of criteria (e.g., water quality indicators) in the aggregation process. The proposed approach is demonstrated using data provided in a study by Swamee and Tyagi [Swamee, P.K., Tyagi, A., 2000. Describing water quality with aggregate index. ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering 126 (5), 451-455] for establishing water quality indices. The Normal distribution and its inverse form were found suitable for compromising or normative decisions, whereas the Exponential and its inverse form were found suitable for pro-risk and risk-averse decisions, respectively. The proposed OWA weight distributions are also compared with the commonly used regular increasing monotone (RIM) functions for generating OWA weights. Sensitivity analyses are carried out to highlight the utility of the proposed approach for multi-criteria decision-making and establishing water quality indices. Crown Copyright (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1368
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators
    Bordogna, G
    Fedrizzi, M
    Pasi, G
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01): : 126 - 132
  • [2] Identification of river water quality using the Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation approach
    Chang, NB
    Chen, HW
    Ning, SK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 63 (03) : 293 - 305
  • [3] Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the heterogeneous group decision-making environment
    Chen, SJ
    Chen, SM
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2005, 36 (03) : 309 - 338
  • [4] A new method for handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems using FN-IOWA operators
    Chen, Shi-Jay
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    [J]. 2003, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (34)
  • [5] On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights
    Filev, D
    Yager, RR
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 94 (02) : 157 - 169
  • [6] An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator weights
    Fullér, R
    Majlender, P
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 124 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [7] 2 VIEWS OF BELIEF - BELIEF AS GENERALIZED PROBABILITY AND BELIEF AS EVIDENCE
    HALPERN, JY
    FAGIN, R
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 54 (03) : 275 - 317
  • [8] A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments
    Herrera, F
    Herrera-Viedma, E
    Verdegay, JL
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 78 (01) : 73 - 87
  • [9] Klir G., 1995, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications, V4
  • [10] LARSEN HL, 2002, FUNDAMENTALS FUZZY S