Eiphosoma laphygmae, a classical solution for the biocontrol of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda?

被引:10
作者
Allen, Tabea [1 ]
Kenis, Marc [2 ]
Norgrove, Lindsey [1 ]
机构
[1] Bern Univ Appl Sci BFH, Sch Agr Forest & Food Sci HAFL, Langgasse 85, CH-3052 Bern, Switzerland
[2] CABI, 1 Rue Grillons, CH-2800 Delemont, Switzerland
关键词
Biological control; Eiphosoma laphygmae; Eiphosoma vitticolle; Fall armyworm; Larval parasitism; Maize; Spodoptera frugiperda; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL AGENTS; LEPIDOPTERA-NOCTUIDAE; NATURAL ENEMIES; HYMENOPTERA-ICHNEUMONIDAE; VITTICOLE HYMENOPTERA; DENTATOR FABRICIUS; NATIVE PARASITES; MAIZE; IMPACT; LARVAE;
D O I
10.1007/s41348-021-00480-9
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, an American Lepidoptera, is invasive in Africa and Asia and currently one of the most damaging cereal pests in the tropics. The ichneumonid parasitoid, Eiphosoma laphygmae, is a potential classical biological control agent. We assessed existing knowledge on biology, identified natural distributions, collated reported parasitism rates from field studies and determined which other parasitoids co-occurred. We discussed the suitability of E. laphygmae for classical biological control as well as identified limitations and knowledge gaps. We conducted a systematic literature review and had 185 hits, retaining 52 papers. Reports on the natural distribution of E. laphygmae were restricted to the American tropics, ranging from North-East Mexico to Sao Paulo State, Brazil. There were only two single and unconfirmed records of it on other hosts, suggesting that the parasitoid may be specific to S. frugiperda, but this needs confirmation. In fields where E. laphygmae occurred naturally, it was the second most important contributor to fall armyworm mortality, after the braconid Chelonus insularis. On average, E. laphygmae parasitized 4.5% of fall armyworm in field studies. The highest parasitism rates were from Costa Rica (13%) and Minas Gerais, Brazil (14.5%). However, these parasitism rates are probably largely underestimated because of likely biases in sampling and parasitism rate calculations. Eiphosoma laphygmae appeared to establish better in more diverse, weedy systems. As African farming systems often have high diversity, this may favour the establishment and parasitism of E. laphygmae if eventually introduced as a classical biological control agent.
引用
收藏
页码:1141 / 1156
页数:16
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Parasitoid Complex of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Ghana and Benin [J].
Agboyi, Lakpo Koku ;
Goergen, Georg ;
Beseh, Patrick ;
Mensah, Samuel Adjei ;
Clottey, Victor Attuquaye ;
Glikpo, Raymond ;
Buddie, Alan ;
Cafa, Giovanni ;
Offord, Lisa ;
Day, Roger ;
Rwomushana, Ivan ;
Kenis, Marc .
INSECTS, 2020, 11 (02)
[2]   Impact of a nucleopolyhedrovirus bioinsecticide and selected synthetic insecticides on the abundance of insect natural enemies on maize in Southern Mexico [J].
Armenta, R ;
Martínez, AM ;
Chapman, JW ;
Magallanes, R ;
Goulson, D ;
Caballero, P ;
Cave, RD ;
Cisneros, J ;
Valle, J ;
Castillejos, V ;
Penagos, DI ;
García, LF ;
Williams, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2003, 96 (03) :649-661
[3]   IMPACT OF NATIVE PARASITES ON THE FALL ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA-FRUGIPERDA (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE), IN SOUTH FLORIDA AND RELEASE OF THE EXOTIC PARASITE, EIPHOSOMA-VITTICOLE (HYMENOPTERA, ICHNUEMONIDAE) [J].
ASHLEY, TR ;
WADDILL, VH ;
MITCHELL, ER ;
RYE, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1982, 11 (04) :833-837
[5]   CLASSIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FALL ARMYWORM PARASITES [J].
ASHLEY, TR .
FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 1979, 62 (02) :114-123
[6]  
Barratt B. I. P., 2011, CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, V6, P1, DOI 10.1079/PAVSNNR20116042
[7]  
CABI, 2019, INV SPEC COMP
[8]   Applications of sugar solutions to maize, and the impact of natural enemies on Fall Armyworm [J].
Canas, LA ;
O'Neil, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 1998, 44 (02) :59-64
[9]  
Cave R. D., 1993, CEIBA, V34, P33
[10]  
Cockerell T.D.A., 1913, Proceedings of the United States National Museum, V46, P61, DOI [10.5479/si.00963801.46-2010.61, DOI 10.5479/SI.00963801.46-2010.61]