Risk aversion and willingness to pay for energy efficient systems in rental apartments

被引:64
作者
Farsi, Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Ctr Energy Policy & Econ, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Energy efficiency; Risk aversion; Choice experiment; DISCRETE-CHOICE MODELS; SAVING MEASURES; UTILITY-MODELS; VALUATION; UNCERTAINTY; PERCEPTIONS; PREFERENCE; DISPARITY; ATTITUDE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.048
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper uses a random utility model to estimate consumers' valuation of energy efficient insulation and ventilation systems in rental apartments. Given consumers' limited experience in residential buildings and the perceived uncertainty about their comfort benefits and resulting energy savings, these relatively new technologies might be undervalued by risk-averse consumers. Using the concept of certainty-equivalence, this paper proposes a model to assess the consumers' risk-aversion for adopting energy-efficient systems. These systems are treated as risky assets while conventional commodities are assumed to be risk-free. The curvature of the utility function is interpreted as a measure of aversion to perceived risks as opposed to explicit risks measured by observed variances. The proposed formulation is applicable in stated preference data with qualitative variables. The model is applied to data from a choice experiment conducted among 264 apartment tenants in Switzerland. The estimated curvatures reject the risk-neutrality hypothesis. The range of the estimated risk premiums suggests that risk considerations remain a central issue in dealing with energy efficiency in residential buildings. The analysis also indicates that assuming same risk attitudes toward new and conventional systems could bias the estimates of the willingness to pay, especially when the system is comprised of several components. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3078 / 3088
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   A simple method of incorporating income effects into logit and nested-logit models: Theory and application [J].
Morey, ER ;
Sharma, VR ;
Karlstrom, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 85 (01) :248-253
[32]   Discounting the distant future: how much do uncertain rates increase valuations? [J].
Newell, RG ;
Pizer, WA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (01) :52-71
[33]  
OTT W, 2006, DIREKTE INDIRE UNPUB
[34]  
Pearce D., 2002, EC VALUATION STATED
[35]   Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis [J].
Poortinga, W ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C ;
Wiersma, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 24 (01) :49-64
[36]   A discussion of "Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: A latent-class model" [J].
Provencher, B ;
Moore, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (01) :117-124
[37]  
Sadler M., 2003, HOME ENERGY PREFEREN
[38]  
SAVAGE I, 1993, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V6, P75
[39]   Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA-WTP disparity:: A meta analytical framework [J].
Sayman, S ;
Öncüler, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 26 (02) :289-312
[40]  
SCARPA R, 2005, APPL SIMULATION METH, P1