Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation

被引:50
作者
Radwin, Laurel E. [1 ]
Cabral, Howard J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Patient Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
confirmatory factor analysis; construct validity; evaluation; internal reliability; Trust in Nurses Scale; DESIRED HEALTH OUTCOMES; QUALITY-OF-CARE; PERCEPTIONS; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
P>Aim. This paper is a report of the continued psychometric evaluation of the Trust in Nurses Scale. Background. Qualitative analyses indicate that trust in nurses is critically important to adult patients. Instruments that distinctively measure this concept are lacking. A middle-range theory of patient-centred nursing care provided the theoretical basis for the Trust in Nurses Scale. Content validity was assessed by an expert panel and patient interviews. Construct validity and reliability were found acceptable using multi-trait/multi-item analysis techniques. These findings were previously reported. Methods. Construct validity and reliability of the Trust in Nurses Scale was assessed in 2007 using data collected during 2004-2005 from 187 hospitalized patients in a haematology-oncology setting. Trust in nurses (the latent factor) was operationalized by five items (manifest variables) using confirmatory factor analyses. Fit statistics included comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis Index, root mean square error of approximation and the standardized root mean square residual. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using coefficient alpha. Findings. Both a five-item and a four-item version demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties. The five-item version met three fit statistics criteria. Fifty-nine per cent of the variance was explained. A four-item version met all fit statistics criteria. Sixty-six per cent of the variance was explained. Acceptable internal consistency reliability was found for both versions. Conclusion. Previous psychometric testing of the Trust in Nurses Scale provided evidence of the instrument's reliability, content validity and construct validity. The presented analyses further support construct validity. Thus, cumulative findings indicate that the instrument measures with a few items the underlying concept of trust.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 689
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
[2]   An exploration of patients' trust in physicians in training [J].
Bonds, DE ;
Foley, KL ;
Dugan, E ;
Hall, MA ;
Extrom, P .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2004, 15 (02) :294-306
[3]  
Carter J H, 2001, Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract, V5, P140
[4]   Is the nursing work index measuring up? Moving beyond estimating reliability to testing validity [J].
Cummings, GG ;
Hayduk, L ;
Estabrooks, CA .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2006, 55 (02) :82-93
[5]  
GIBSON D, 1988, THESIS U ALABAMA BIR
[6]  
GRAVES J, 1996, THESIS U COLORADO HL
[7]   Disclosure of HIV status: Experiences and perceptions of persons living with HIV/AIDS and nurses involved in their care in Africa [J].
Greeff, Minrie ;
Phetlhu, Rene ;
Makoae, Lucia N. ;
Dlamini, Priscilla S. ;
Holzemer, William L. ;
Naidoo, Joanne R. ;
Kohi, Thecla W. ;
Uys, Leana R. ;
Chirwa, Maureen L. .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (03) :311-324
[8]   The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries [J].
Jenkinson, C ;
Coulter, A ;
Bruster, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 14 (05) :353-358
[9]  
Muthen LK., 2019, MPLUS USERS GUIDE, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1600-0447.2011.01711.X
[10]  
Radwin L, 2000, RES NURS HEALTH, V23, P179, DOI 10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<179::AID-NUR2>3.0.CO