Applying Uncertainty Quantification to Structural Systems: Parameter Reduction for Evaluating Model Complexity

被引:2
作者
Locke, Robert [1 ]
Kupis, Shyla [2 ]
Gehb, Christopher M. [3 ]
Platz, Roland [4 ]
Atamturktur, Sez [5 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Environm Engn & Earth Sci, Clemson, SC USA
[3] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Syst Reliabil Adapt Struct & Machine Acoust SAM, Darmstadt, Germany
[4] Fraunhofer Inst Struct Durabil & Syst Reliabil LB, Darmstadt, Germany
[5] Penn State, Dept Architectural Engn, University Pk, PA USA
来源
MODEL VALIDATION AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, VOL 3 | 2020年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Sensitivity analysis; Analysis of variation; Uncertainty quantification; Bayesian inference; MCMC; VERIFICATION; CALIBRATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_28
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Different mathematical models can be developed to represent the dynamic behavior of structural systems and assess properties, such as risk of failure and reliability. Selecting an adequate model requires choosing a model of sufficient complexity to accurately capture the output responses under various operational conditions. However, as model complexity increases, the functional relationship between input parameters varies and the number of parameters required to represent the physical system increases, reducing computational efficiency and increasing modeling difficulty. The process of model selection is further exacerbated by uncertainty introduced from input parameters, noise in experimental measurements, numerical solutions, and model form. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the acceptable level of uncertainty that can be present within numerical models, while reliably capturing the fundamental physics of a subject system. However, before uncertainty quantification can be performed, a sensitivity analysis study is required to prevent numerical ill-conditioning from parameters that contribute insignificant variability to the output response features of interest. The main focus of this paper, therefore, is to employ sensitivity analysis tools on models to remove low sensitivity parameters from the calibration space. The subject system in this study is a modular spring-damper system integrated into a space truss structure. Six different cases of increasing complexity are derived from a mathematical model designed from a two-degree of freedom (2DOF) mass spring-damper that neglects single truss properties, such as geometry and truss member material properties. Model sensitivity analysis is performed using the Analysis of Variation (ANOVA) and the Coefficient of Determination R-2. The global sensitivity results for the parameters in each 2DOF case are determined from the R-2 calculation and compared in performance to evaluate levels of parameter contribution. Parameters with a weighted R-2 value less than .02 account for less than 2% of the variation in the output responses and are removed from the calibration space. This paper concludes with an outlook on implementing Bayesian inference methodologies, delayed-acceptance single-component adaptive Metropolis (DA-SCAM) algorithm and Gaussian Process Models for Simulation Analysis (GPM/SA), to select the most representative mathematical model and set of input parameters that best characterize the system's dynamic behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 256
页数:16
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Uncertainty quantification in model verification and validation as applied to large scale historic masonry monuments [J].
Atamturktur, S. ;
Hemez, F. M. ;
Laman, J. A. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 43 :221-234
[2]   NEW METHODS OF QUALITY-CONTROL [J].
BARNARD, GA .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1963, 126 (02) :255-258
[3]  
Chopra A.K., 2012, DYNAMICS STRUCTURE
[4]   Markov chain Monte Carlo using an approximation [J].
Christen, JA ;
Fox, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2005, 14 (04) :795-810
[5]  
ContiTech, 2011, SCHWINGMETALL ORIGIN, P28
[6]  
Czop P., 2016, REDUCING AERATION AN
[7]  
Duym S.W., 1997, PHYSICAL MODELING HY
[8]   A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications [J].
Eck, Vinzenz Gregor ;
Donders, Wouter Paulus ;
Sturdy, Jacob ;
Feinberg, Jonathan ;
Delhaas, Tammo ;
Hellevik, Leif Rune ;
Huberts, Wouter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 32 (08)
[9]   Error and Uncertainty Analysis of Inexact and Imprecise Computer Models [J].
Farajpour, Ismail ;
Atamturktur, Sez .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2013, 27 (04) :407-418
[10]  
Fox C., 1997, SAMPLING CONDUCTIVIT