Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding

被引:258
作者
Hoang, Ha [1 ]
Gimeno, Javier [2 ]
机构
[1] ESSEC, F-95021 Cergy Pontoise, France
[2] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
关键词
Founder role identity; Entrepreneurial transition; Persistence; Organizational founding; Identity centrality; Identity complexity; SELF-COMPLEXITY; ROLE CONFLICT; ORGANIZATIONS; WORK; BEHAVIOR; SUCCESS; FIRMS; CONCEPTUALIZATION; SOCIALIZATION; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.07.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We develop a new theory that views organizational founding as involving a role transition. Through the construct of founder role identity, we delineate how identity centrality and complexity affect individuals' ability to exit a work role in order to undertake founding activities. We argue that individuals are challenged to adjust to the founder role requirements and incorporate the new role into an overall self-concept. We then delineate how configurations of founder role identities influence persistence, and the longer-term outcomes of dormancy and successful founding. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 53
页数:13
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Aldrich H, 1999, ORG EVOLVING
  • [2] [Anonymous], WORKING IDENTITIES U
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, Women entrepreneurs: Moving beyond the glass ceiling
  • [4] [Anonymous], UNTERNEHMENSGRUNDUNG
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, BOUNDARYLESS CAREER
  • [6] ASHFORD SJ, 1990, RES PERSONNEL HUMAN, P1
  • [7] Ashforth B.E., 2001, SOCIAL IDENTITY PROC, P31, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315800530
  • [8] How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity
    Ashforth, BE
    Kreiner, GE
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) : 413 - 434
  • [9] Barley S.R., 1989, HDB CAREER THEORY, P41, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511625459.005
  • [10] Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations
    Baron, JN
    Hannan, MT
    Burton, MD
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 64 (04) : 527 - 547