Effects of Central Corneal Stromal Thickness and Epithelial Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Using Goldmann Applanation and Non-Contact Tonometers

被引:23
|
作者
Lee, Marvin [1 ]
Ahn, Jaehong [2 ]
机构
[1] DMC Bundang Jesaeng Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Suwon 441749, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; GLAUCOMA; AGE; REDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0151868
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate whether corneal thickness parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), such as central corneal thickness (CCT), central corneal stromal thickness (CCST), and central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET), influence the intraocular pressure (IOP) difference measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT). Methods In total, 50 eyes from 50 subjects without glaucomatous defects were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. We measured IOP using GAT and NCT and calculated the difference between the two methods. CCT was measured by a Cirrus HD-OCT device using anterior segment imaging. The basement membrane of the epithelium, which was seen as a high-reflection line in the OCT image, was taken as a reference line to measure CCST and CCET. Results The mean IOP measured by GAT and NCT was 16.7 +/- 3.0 and 18.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP difference was 1.5 +/- 1.7 mmHg, and the IOP measured by NCT was 8.4% +/- 11.3% higher than that measured by GAT. The CCET and CCST were 57.9 +/- 5.6 and 501.7 +/- 33.8 mu m, respectively. CCT showed a positive correlation with both GAT IOP (r = 0.648, P < 0.001) and NCT IOP (r = 0.676, P < 0.001). Although CCST showed a significant correlation with GAT IOP and NCT IOP, CCET did not. The difference between GAT IOP and NCT IOP increased with CCT (r = 0.333, P = 0.018), and CCET was positively correlated with the IOP difference between GAT and NCT (r = 0.435, P = 0.002). Conclusions IOP increased with greater CCT, and CCST seemed to have a more important role than CCET. CCET also increased with greater CCT, and this may be a possible explanation for the increasing difference in IOP between GAT and NCT with increasing CCT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study
    Mansoori, Tarannum
    Balakrishna, Nagalla
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (03) : 959 - 966
  • [22] Intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in a healthy student population
    Stamenkovic, Miroslav
    Marjanovic, Ivan
    Maric, Vesna
    Kalezic, Tanja
    Bozic, Marija
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2024, 152 (3-4) : 175 - 178
  • [23] Effects of 0.5% tetracaine hydrochloride on central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure
    Manassakorn, Anita
    Chaidaroon, Winai
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2012, 6 (02) : 291 - 296
  • [24] Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure in Malay Children
    Heidary, Fatemah
    Gharebaghi, Reza
    Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan
    Naing, Nyi Nyi
    Wan-Arfah, Nadiah
    Shatriah, Ismail
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (10):
  • [25] Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in premature infants
    Sekeroglu, Mehmet Ali
    Hekimoglu, Emre
    Petricli, Ikbal Seza
    Karakaya, Jale
    Ozcan, Beyza
    Yucel, Husniye
    Kavurt, Aysen Sumru
    Bas, Ahmet Yagmur
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 35 (06) : 847 - 851
  • [26] Hornhautdickenabhängige Korrekturfaktoren bei der Goldmann-ApplanationstonometrieCorrection factors for central corneal thickness in Goldmann applanation tonometry
    A. Kutschan
    B. Schroeder
    A. Hager
    H. Dave
    K. Wegscheider
    W. Wiegand
    Der Ophthalmologe, 2010, 107 (1): : 30 - 35
  • [27] Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
    Andreanos, Konstantinos
    Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
    Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
    Diagourtas, Andreas
    Kotoulas, Andreas
    Dimitrakas, Panagiotis
    Moschos, Marilita M.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 2477 - 2484
  • [28] Relationship of Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure by iCare Rebound Tonometer
    Rao, Aparna
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Prakash, B.
    Varshney, Gopal
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (06) : 380 - 384
  • [29] Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucoma risk assessment
    Pensyl, D.
    Sullivan-Mee, M.
    Torres-Monte, M.
    Halverson, K.
    Qualls, C.
    EYE, 2012, 26 (10) : 1349 - 1356
  • [30] Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucoma risk assessment
    D Pensyl
    M Sullivan-Mee
    M Torres-Monte
    K Halverson
    C Qualls
    Eye, 2012, 26 : 1349 - 1356