Effects of Central Corneal Stromal Thickness and Epithelial Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Using Goldmann Applanation and Non-Contact Tonometers

被引:23
|
作者
Lee, Marvin [1 ]
Ahn, Jaehong [2 ]
机构
[1] DMC Bundang Jesaeng Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Suwon 441749, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; GLAUCOMA; AGE; REDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0151868
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate whether corneal thickness parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), such as central corneal thickness (CCT), central corneal stromal thickness (CCST), and central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET), influence the intraocular pressure (IOP) difference measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT). Methods In total, 50 eyes from 50 subjects without glaucomatous defects were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. We measured IOP using GAT and NCT and calculated the difference between the two methods. CCT was measured by a Cirrus HD-OCT device using anterior segment imaging. The basement membrane of the epithelium, which was seen as a high-reflection line in the OCT image, was taken as a reference line to measure CCST and CCET. Results The mean IOP measured by GAT and NCT was 16.7 +/- 3.0 and 18.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP difference was 1.5 +/- 1.7 mmHg, and the IOP measured by NCT was 8.4% +/- 11.3% higher than that measured by GAT. The CCET and CCST were 57.9 +/- 5.6 and 501.7 +/- 33.8 mu m, respectively. CCT showed a positive correlation with both GAT IOP (r = 0.648, P < 0.001) and NCT IOP (r = 0.676, P < 0.001). Although CCST showed a significant correlation with GAT IOP and NCT IOP, CCET did not. The difference between GAT IOP and NCT IOP increased with CCT (r = 0.333, P = 0.018), and CCET was positively correlated with the IOP difference between GAT and NCT (r = 0.435, P = 0.002). Conclusions IOP increased with greater CCT, and CCST seemed to have a more important role than CCET. CCET also increased with greater CCT, and this may be a possible explanation for the increasing difference in IOP between GAT and NCT with increasing CCT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers
    Almubrad, Turki M.
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2010, 93 (02) : 77 - 82
  • [2] The Association of Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measures by Non-Contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry among Glaucoma Patients.
    Kyei, Samuel
    Assiamah, Frank
    Kwarteng, Michael Agyemang
    Gboglu, Cynthia Pakyennu
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (06) : 999 - 1004
  • [3] Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects
    Pelit, Aysel
    Altan-Yaycioglu, Rana
    Pelit, Aykut
    Akova, Yonca A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2009, 92 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [4] Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness - A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry
    Domke, N.
    Hager, A.
    Wiegand, W.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2006, 103 (07): : 583 - 587
  • [5] Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals
    Kamel, Khalid
    Dervan, Edward
    Falzon, Kevin
    O'Brien, Colm
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 (01) : 321 - 325
  • [6] Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Yaoeda, Kiyoshi
    Fukushima, Atsushi
    Shirakashi, Motohiro
    Fukuchi, Takeo
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 829 - 834
  • [7] The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Among Selected Ethiopian Communities
    Gelaw, Yeshigeta
    Kollmann, Martin
    Irungu, Njuguna M.
    Ilako, Dunera R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (08) : 514 - 518
  • [8] Correction factors for central corneal thickness in Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Kutschan, A.
    Schroeder, B.
    Hager, A.
    Dave, H.
    Wegscheider, K.
    Wiegand, W.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2010, 107 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [9] The influence of corneal density and thickness on tonometry measurement with goldmann applanation, non-contact and iCare tonometry methods
    Ahmed Lubbad
    Irene Oluwatoba-Popoola
    Melanie Haar
    Carsten Framme
    Anna Bajor
    International Ophthalmology, 2022, 42 : 2167 - 2174
  • [10] The influence of corneal density and thickness on tonometry measurement with goldmann applanation, non-contact and iCare tonometry methods
    Lubbad, Ahmed
    Oluwatoba-Popoola, Irene
    Haar, Melanie
    Framme, Carsten
    Bajor, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 2167 - 2174