A Multination Study of Socioeconomic Inequality in Expectations for Progression to Higher Education: The Role of Between-School Tracking and Ability Stratification

被引:53
作者
Parker, Philip D. [1 ]
Jerrim, John [2 ]
Schoon, Ingrid [3 ,4 ]
Marsh, Herbert W. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Inst Posit Psychol & Educ, 25A Barker Rd, Strathfield, NSW 2135, Australia
[2] UCL, Inst Educ, Educ & Social Stat, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] UCL, Inst Educ, Human Dev & Social Policy, London WC1E 6BT, England
[4] Wissensch Zentrum Berlin Sozialforsch, Berlin, Germany
[5] Australian Catholic Univ, Inst Posit Psychol & Educ, Educ Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[6] King Saud Univ, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
educational expectations; educational inequality; primary and secondary effects; curricular tracking; ability stratification; CLASS DIFFERENTIALS; ATTAINMENT; GENDER; ASPIRATIONS; ACHIEVEMENT; OPPORTUNITY; PREDICTORS; COUNTRIES; MODELS; PUPILS;
D O I
10.3102/0002831215621786
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Persistent inequalities in educational expectations across societies are a growing concern. Recent research has explored the extent to which inequalities in education are due to primary effects (i.e., achievement differentials) versus secondary effects (i.e., choice behaviors net of achievement). We explore educational expectations in order to consider whether variations in primary and secondary effects are associated with country variation in curricular and ability stratification. We use evidence from the PISA 2003 database to test the hypothesis that (a) greater between-school academic stratification would be associated with stronger relationships between socioeconomic status and educational expectations and (b) when this effect is decomposed, achievement differentials would explain a greater proportion of this relationship in countries with greater stratification. Results supported these hypotheses.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 32
页数:27
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, APPL CAUSALLY DEFINE
[2]  
Bol T., 2013, WORKING PAPER
[3]  
Boudon R., 1974, Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society
[4]  
Bourdieu Pierre, 1986, Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste
[5]  
Bozick R, 2010, SOC FORCES, V88, P2027
[6]   Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility [J].
Breen, R ;
Jonsson, JO .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 31 :223-243
[7]   Explaining educational differentials - Towards a formal rational action theory [J].
Breen, R ;
Goldthorpe, JH .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1997, 9 (03) :275-305
[8]   Nonpersistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries [J].
Breen, Richard ;
Luijkx, Ruud ;
Muller, Walter ;
Pollak, Reinhard .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 114 (05) :1475-1521
[9]   Stratified or comprehensive? The economic efficiency of school design [J].
Brunello, G ;
Giannini, M .
SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 51 (02) :173-193
[10]  
Brunello G, 2007, ECON POLICY, P781