PLATFORMS, OPEN/USER INNOVATION, AND ECOSYSTEMS: A STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP PERSPECTIVE

被引:45
作者
Altman, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Tushman, Michael L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[2] Harvard Sch Business, Boston, MA USA
来源
ENTREPRENEURSHIP, INNOVATION, AND PLATFORMS | 2017年 / 37卷
关键词
Platforms; open/user innovation; ecosystems; crowdsourcing; institutional logics; strategic leadership; top management teams; CEO role; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; RESOURCE DEPENDENCE; COMPETING LOGICS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; VALUE-CREATION; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; BOARDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/S0742-332220170000037007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Platform, open/user innovation, and ecosystem strategies embrace and enable interactions with external entities. Firms pursuing these approaches conduct business and interact with environments differently than those pursuing traditional closed strategies. This chapter considers these strategies together highlighting similarities and differences between platform, open/user innovation, and ecosystem strategies. We focus on managerial and organizational challenges for organizations pursuing these strategies and identify four institutional logic shifts associated with these strategic transitions: (1) increasing external focus, (2) moving to greater openness, (3) focusing on enabling interactions, and (4) adopting interaction-centric metrics. As mature incumbent organizations adopt these strategies, there may be tensions and multiple conflicting institutional logics. Additionally, we consider four strategic leadership topics and how they relate to platform, open/user innovation, and ecosystem strategies: (1) executive orientation and experience, (2) top management teams, (3) board-management relations, and (4) executive compensation. We discuss theoretical implications, and consider future directions and research opportunities.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 207
页数:31
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Adner R., 2013, INTRO COLLABORATION
[2]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[3]   Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct [J].
Afuah, Allan .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (03) :257-273
[4]   CROWDSOURCING AS A SOLUTION TO DISTANT SEARCH [J].
Afuah, Allan ;
Tucci, Christopher L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 (03) :355-375
[5]  
Altman E.J., 2017, MANAGED ECOSYSTEMS K
[6]  
Altman E.J, 2017, DEPENDENCY CHALLENGE
[7]  
Altman E.J., 2015, OXFORD HDB CREATIVIT, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2364523
[8]  
Antorini YM, 2012, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V53, P73
[9]   How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study [J].
Baldwin, Carliss ;
Hienerth, Christoph ;
von Hippel, Eric .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (09) :1291-1313
[10]   Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation [J].
Baldwin, Carliss ;
von Hippel, Eric .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (06) :1399-1417