Input-response space-filling designs

被引:13
作者
Lu, Lu [1 ]
Anderson-Cook, Christine M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Math & Stat, 4202 EFowlerAve, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM USA
关键词
design augmentation; maximin designs; multi-objective optimization; Pareto front; sequential experiment; COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS; BAYESIAN DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/qre.2931
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Traditional space-filling designs are a convenient way to explore throughout an input space of flexible dimension and have design points close to any region where future predictions might be of interest. In some applications, there may be a model connecting the input factors to the response(s), which provides an opportunity to consider the spacing not only in the input space but also in the response space. In this paper, we present an approach for leveraging current understanding of the relationship between inputs and responses to generate designs that allow the experimenter to flexibly balance the spacing in these two regions to find an appropriate design for the experimental goals. Applications where good spacing of the observed response values include calibration problems where the goal is to demonstrate the adequacy of the model across the range of the responses, sensitivity studies where the outputs from a submodel may be used as inputs for subsequent models, and inverse problems where the outputs of a process will be used in the inverse prediction for the unknown inputs. We use the multi-objective optimization method of Pareto fronts to generate multiple non-dominated designs with different emphases on the input and response space-filling criteria from which the experimenter can choose. The methods are illustrated through several examples and a chemical engineering case study.
引用
收藏
页码:3529 / 3551
页数:23
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Rethinking the Optimal Response Surface Design for a First-Order Model with Two-Factor Interactions, When Protecting against Curvature [J].
Lu, Lu ;
Anderson-Cook, Christine M. .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2012, 24 (03) :404-422
[22]   Optimization of Designed Experiments Based on Multiple Criteria Utilizing a Pareto Frontier [J].
Lu, Lu ;
Anderson-Cook, Christine M. ;
Robinson, Timothy J. .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2011, 53 (04) :353-365
[23]   A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE [J].
MCKAY, MD ;
BECKMAN, RJ ;
CONOVER, WJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) :239-245
[24]   Development of a framework for sequential Bayesian design of experiments: Application to a pilot-scale solvent-based CO2 capture process [J].
Morgan, Joshua C. ;
Chinen, Anderson Soares ;
Anderson-Cook, Christine ;
Tong, Charles ;
Carroll, John ;
Saha, Chiranjib ;
Omell, Benjamin ;
Bhattacharyya, Debangsu ;
Matuszewski, Michael ;
Bhat, K. Sham ;
Miller, David C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 262
[25]   EXPLORATORY DESIGNS FOR COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIMENTS [J].
MORRIS, MD ;
MITCHELL, TJ .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1995, 43 (03) :381-402
[26]  
Myers, 2020, ROBUST EXPT DESIGN M
[27]  
Myers H.R, 2016, RESPONSE SURFACE MET, V4th ed.
[28]   Bayesian Design of Experiments Using Approximate Coordinate Exchange [J].
Overstall, Antony M. ;
Woods, David C. .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2017, 59 (04) :458-470
[29]   Design of computer experiments: space filling and beyond [J].
Pronzato, Luc ;
Mueller, Werner G. .
STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2012, 22 (03) :681-701
[30]   Comparing Computer Experiments for the Gaussian Process Model Using Integrated Prediction Variance [J].
Silvestrini, Rachel T. ;
Montgomery, Douglas C. ;
Jones, Bradley .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2013, 25 (02) :164-174