On the Epistemology of the Precautionary Principle

被引：7

作者：

Carter, J. Adam ^{[1
,2
]}

Peterson, Martin ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Sect Philosophy & Eth, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands

[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Eidyn Res Ctr, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, Midlothian, Scotland

来源：

ERKENNTNIS | 2015年 / 80卷 / 01期

关键词：

Epistemic State; Precautionary Principle; Knowledge Attribution; Contextualist Approach; Epistemic Standard;

D O I：

10.1007/s10670-014-9609-x

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

In this paper we present two distinctly epistemological puzzles that arise for one who aspires to defend some plausible version of the precautionary principle. The first puzzle involves an application of contextualism in epistemology; and the second puzzle concerns the task of defending a plausible version of the precautionary principle that would not be invalidated by de minimis.

引用

页码：1 / 13

页数：13

共 30 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1998, Wingspread statement on the precautionary principle

[2]

[Anonymous], 1998, VANCOUVER STATEMENT

[3]

[Anonymous], 2000, RETHINKING RISK PREC

[4]

ASHFORD Nicholas A., 2007, Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Approaches from The Nordic Countries, the EU and USA

[5] On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle [J].

Aven, Terje .

RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (10) :1515-1525

[6] Classic invariantism, relevance and warranted assertability maneuvres [J].

Black, T .

PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2005, 55 (219) :328-336

[7]

BODANSKY D, 1992, ENVIRONMENT, V34, P4

[8]

CHARNLEY G, 1999, RISK NEWSLETTER, V19, P2

[9] Future technologies, dystopic futures and the precautionary principle [J].

Clarke S. .

Ethics and Information Technology, 2005, 7 (03) :121-126

[10] CONTEXTUALISM AND KNOWLEDGE ATTRIBUTIONS [J].

DEROSE, K .

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 52 (04) :913-929

← 1 2 3 →