Computational intelligence applied to the least limiting water range to estimate soil water content using GIS and geostatistical approaches in alluvial lands*

被引:7
作者
Alaboz, Pelin [1 ]
Baskan, Oguz [2 ]
Dengiz, Orhan [3 ]
机构
[1] Isparta Univ Appl Sci, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, Isparta, Turkey
[2] Siirt Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, Siirt, Turkey
[3] Ondokuz Maps Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, Samsun, Turkey
关键词
alluvial lands; artificial neural networks; least limiting water range; pedotransfer functions; FIELD-CAPACITY; RESISTANCE; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1002/ird.2628
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The use of machine learning methods in pedotransfer functions has attracted considerable attention in recent years. These methods are fast and effective in solving complex events. The least limiting water range (LLWR) feature is very important in terms of water uptake by the plant and root development in agricultural production. In this study, the predictability of the LLWR feature was investigated with artificial neural networks, deep learning (DL) and the k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) algorithm from machine learning methods. Estimated values obtained from the model with the best estimation accuracy and observed values were evaluated through a geostatistical method from which their spatial distribution maps were created. In the present study, which was carried out on alluvial lands with different soil properties, the LLWR values of soils vary between 5.5% and 25.9%. Field capacity, bulk density, clay, organic matter, and lime content properties, which have a high correlation with the LLWR, were taken into consideration in the estimation methods. DL was determined as the best estimation method (mean absolute error [MAE]: 0.94%; root mean square error [RMSE]: 1.45%; coefficient of determination [R-2]: 0.93), and the worst was k-NN (MAE: 2.00%; RMSE: 2.55%; R-2: 0.77) for the LLWR. In addition, the LLWR can be estimated with high accuracy by using ReLU and softmax functions in the DL method. The study shows that distribution maps created with LLWR values obtained by observed data and the DL method have a very similar pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1144
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Changes in distribution patterns of soil penetration resistance within a silage-corn field following the use of heavy harvesting equipments [J].
Aksakal, Ekrem Luetfi ;
Oztas, Taskin .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2010, 34 (02) :173-179
[2]  
Alaboz P., 2021, Soil and Water Journal, V10, P13, DOI [10.21657/topraksu.752137, DOI 10.21657/TOPRAKSU.752137]
[3]  
Alaboz Pelin, 2020, Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, V17, P432, DOI 10.33462/jotaf.710411
[4]  
Aydin Arif, 2019, Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, V8, P301, DOI 10.29278/azd.538555
[5]   HYDROMETER METHOD IMPROVED FOR MAKING PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSES OF SOILS [J].
BOUYOUCOS, GJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1962, 54 (05) :464-&
[6]  
Busscher W. J., 1990, Transactions of the ASAE, V33, P519, DOI 10.13031/2013.31360
[7]  
Cakir F.S., 2019, Artificial neural networks, V2nd
[8]   LEAST LIMITING WATER RANGE IN SOIL UNDER CROP ROTATIONS AND CHISELING [J].
Calonego, Juliano Carlos ;
Rosolem, Ciro Antonio .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2011, 35 (03) :759-771
[9]   PENETR - A GENERALIZED SEMIEMPIRICAL MODEL ESTIMATING SOIL RESISTANCE TO PENETRATION [J].
CANARACHE, A .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1990, 16 (1-2) :51-70
[10]  
Coșkun A., 2016, Turkiye Tarimsal Araștirmalar Dergisi, V3, P1