The impact of the Sepsis-3 definition on ICU admission of patients with infection

被引:8
|
作者
Klimpel, Jenny [1 ]
Weidhase, Lorenz [1 ]
Bernhard, Michael [2 ]
Gries, Andre [3 ]
Petros, Sirak [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Med ICU, Liebigstr 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Emergency Dept, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Emergency Dept, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Sepsis; qSOFA; SOFA score; Intensive care; Infection; Mortality; Emergency department; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CLINICAL-CRITERIA; DISEASES-SOCIETY; SEPTIC SHOCK; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13049-019-0680-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated inflammation following an infection. However, the impact of this definition on patient care is not fully clear. This study investigated the impact of the current definition on ICU admission of patients with infection. Methods We performed a prospective observational study over twelve months on consecutive patients presented to our emergency department and admitted for infection. We analyzed the predictive values of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, the SOFA score and blood lactate regarding ICU admission. Results We included 916 patients with the diagnosis of infection. Median age was 74 years (IQR 62-82 years), and 56.3% were males. There were 219 direct ICU admissions and 697 general ward admissions. A qSOFA score of >= 2 points had 52.9% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity regarding sepsis diagnosis. A qSOFA score of >= 2 points had 87.2% specificity but only 39.9% sensitivity to predict ICU admission. A SOFA score of >= 2 points had 97.4% sensitivity, but only 17.1% specificity to predict ICU admission, while a SOFA score of >= 4 points predicted ICU admission with 82.6% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity. The area under the receiver operating curve regarding ICU admission was 0.81 (95 CI, 0.77-0.86) for SOFA score, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.48-0.61) for blood lactate, and only 0.34 (95% CI, 0.28-0.40) for qSOFA on emergency department presentation. Conclusions While a positive qSOFA score had a high specificity regarding ICU admission, the low sensitivity of the score among septic patients as well as among ICU admissions considerably limited its value in routine patient management. The SOFA score was the better predictor of ICU admission, while the predictive value of blood lactate was equivocal.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Presepsin level in predicting patients' in-hospital mortality from sepsis under sepsis-3 criteria
    Wen, Miao-Yun
    Huang, Lin-Qiang
    Yang, Fan
    Ye, Jing-Kun
    Cai, Geng-Xin
    Li, Xu-Sheng
    Ding, Hong-Guang
    Zeng, Hong-Ke
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 : 733 - 739
  • [42] Sepsis-3: Of Love and Bliss
    Deutschman, Clifford S.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (04) : 739 - 740
  • [43] Association of ischemia modified albumin with mortality in qSOFA positive sepsis patients by sepsis-3 in the emergency department
    Park, Jonghak
    Ahn, Sejoong
    Lee, Seonggeun
    Song, Juhyun
    Moon, Sungwoo
    Kim, Jooyeong
    Cho, Hanjin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 44 : 72 - 77
  • [44] The characteristics and impact of source of infection on sepsis-related ICU outcomes
    Jeganathan, Niranjan
    Yau, Stephen
    Ahuja, Neha
    Otu, Dara
    Stein, Brian
    Fogg, Louis
    Balk, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 41 : 170 - 176
  • [45] Sepsis-3 definitions predict ICU mortality in a low–middle-income country
    Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen
    Thiago Gomes Romano
    Antonio Paulo Nassar
    Leandro Utino Taniguchi
    Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo
    Pedro Vitale Mendes
    Fernando Godinho Zampieri
    Marcelo Park
    Annals of Intensive Care, 6
  • [46] Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in critical care units: comparison between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations using a national critical care database
    Shankar-Hari, M.
    Harrison, D. A.
    Rubenfeld, G. D.
    Rowan, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (04) : 626 - 636
  • [47] Comparative Usefulness of Sepsis-3, Burn Sepsis, and Conventional Sepsis Criteria in Patients With Major Burns
    Yoon, Jaechul
    Kym, Dohern
    Hur, Jun
    Kim, Youngmin
    Yang, Hyeong-Tae
    Yim, Haejun
    Cho, Yong Suk
    Chun, Wook
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (07) : E656 - E662
  • [48] Procalcitonin as a prognostic marker for sepsis based on SEPSIS-3
    Jekarl, Dong Wook
    Lee, Seungok
    Kim, Myungshin
    Kim, Yonggoo
    Woo, Seon Hee
    Lee, Woon Jeong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2019, 33 (09)
  • [49] Predictive accuracy of Sepsis-3 definitions for mortality among adult critically ill patients with suspected infection
    Chen Qi-Hong
    Shao Jun
    Liu Wei-Li
    Wang Hua-Ling
    Liu Lei
    Gu Xiao-Hua
    Zheng Rui-Qiang
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2019, 132 (10) : 1147 - 1153
  • [50] Association of ICU Admission and Outcomes in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure
    Anesi, George L.
    Liu, Vincent X.
    Chowdhury, Marzana
    Small, Dylan S.
    Wang, Wei
    Delgado, M. Kit
    Bayes, Brian
    Dress, Erich
    Escobar, Gabriel J.
    Halpern, Scott D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205 (05) : 520 - 528