The impact of the Sepsis-3 definition on ICU admission of patients with infection

被引:8
|
作者
Klimpel, Jenny [1 ]
Weidhase, Lorenz [1 ]
Bernhard, Michael [2 ]
Gries, Andre [3 ]
Petros, Sirak [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Med ICU, Liebigstr 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Emergency Dept, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Emergency Dept, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Sepsis; qSOFA; SOFA score; Intensive care; Infection; Mortality; Emergency department; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CLINICAL-CRITERIA; DISEASES-SOCIETY; SEPTIC SHOCK; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13049-019-0680-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated inflammation following an infection. However, the impact of this definition on patient care is not fully clear. This study investigated the impact of the current definition on ICU admission of patients with infection. Methods We performed a prospective observational study over twelve months on consecutive patients presented to our emergency department and admitted for infection. We analyzed the predictive values of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, the SOFA score and blood lactate regarding ICU admission. Results We included 916 patients with the diagnosis of infection. Median age was 74 years (IQR 62-82 years), and 56.3% were males. There were 219 direct ICU admissions and 697 general ward admissions. A qSOFA score of >= 2 points had 52.9% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity regarding sepsis diagnosis. A qSOFA score of >= 2 points had 87.2% specificity but only 39.9% sensitivity to predict ICU admission. A SOFA score of >= 2 points had 97.4% sensitivity, but only 17.1% specificity to predict ICU admission, while a SOFA score of >= 4 points predicted ICU admission with 82.6% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity. The area under the receiver operating curve regarding ICU admission was 0.81 (95 CI, 0.77-0.86) for SOFA score, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.48-0.61) for blood lactate, and only 0.34 (95% CI, 0.28-0.40) for qSOFA on emergency department presentation. Conclusions While a positive qSOFA score had a high specificity regarding ICU admission, the low sensitivity of the score among septic patients as well as among ICU admissions considerably limited its value in routine patient management. The SOFA score was the better predictor of ICU admission, while the predictive value of blood lactate was equivocal.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of the Sepsis-3 definition on ICU admission of patients with infection
    Jenny Klimpel
    Lorenz Weidhase
    Michael Bernhard
    André Gries
    Sirak Petros
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 27
  • [2] Clinical Evaluation of Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 in the ICU
    Fang, Xueling
    Wang, Zhenzhen
    Yang, Jun
    Cai, Hongliu
    Yao, Zhengjie
    Li, Kun
    Fang, Qiang
    CHEST, 2018, 153 (05) : 1169 - 1176
  • [3] qSOFA as predictor of mortality and prolonged ICU admission in Emergency Department patients with suspected infection
    Canet, Emmanuel
    Taylor, David McD
    Khor, Richard
    Krishnan, Vivek
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 48 : 118 - 123
  • [4] Predictive accuracy of Sepsis-3 definitions for mortality among adult critically ill patients with suspected infection
    Chen, Qi-Hong
    Shao, Jun
    Liu, Wei-Li
    Wang, Hua-Ling
    Liu, Lei
    Gu, Xiao-Hua
    Zheng, Rui-Qiang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 132 (10) : 1147 - 1153
  • [5] The Effect of the Intelligent Sepsis Management System on Outcomes among Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock Diagnosed According to the Sepsis-3 Definition in the Emergency Department
    Song, Juhyun
    Cho, Hanjin
    Park, Dae Won
    Ahn, Sejoong
    Kim, Joo Yeong
    Seok, Hyeri
    Park, Jonghak
    Moon, Sungwoo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (11)
  • [6] Robustness of sepsis-3 criteria in critically ill patients
    Verboom, Diana M.
    Frencken, Jos F.
    Ong, David S. Y.
    Horn, Janneke
    van der Poll, Tom
    Bonten, Marc J. M.
    Cremer, Olaf L.
    Klouwenberg, Peter M. C. Klein
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2019, 7 (01)
  • [7] Time for Sepsis-3 in Children?
    Schlapbach, Luregn J.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (08) : 805 - 806
  • [8] Risk factors for infection and evaluation of Sepsis-3 in patients with trauma
    Eguia, Emanuel
    Cobb, Adrienne N.
    Baker, Marshall S.
    Joyce, Cara
    Gilbert, Emily
    Gonzalez, Richard
    Afshar, Majid
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 218 (05) : 851 - 857
  • [9] The prognostic performance of Sepsis-3 and SIRS criteria for patients with urolithiasis-associated sepsis transferred to ICU following surgical interventions
    Shi, Bowen
    Shi, Fei
    Xu, Ke
    Shi, Liuhui
    Tang, Haixiao
    Wang, Ning
    Wu, Yanyuan
    Gu, Jun
    Ding, Jie
    Huang, Yunteng
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (05) : 4165 - 4172
  • [10] Prospective Observational Study Comparing Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions in Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients
    Poutsiaka, Debra D.
    Porto, Maura C.
    Perry, Whitney A.
    Hudcova, Jana
    Tybor, David J.
    Hadley, Susan
    Doron, Shira
    Reich, John A.
    Snydman, David R.
    Nasraway, Stanley A.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 6 (07):