Assessing the link between implementation fidelity and health outcomes for a trial of intensive case management by community health workers: a mixed methods study protocol

被引:2
作者
Schmidt, Barbara [1 ,3 ]
Watt, Kerrianne [2 ]
McDermott, Robyn [1 ,3 ]
Mills, Jane [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Cairns, Australia
来源
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH | 2017年 / 17卷
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Implementation fidelity; Primary health care; Chronic disease; Indigenous; REMOTE AUSTRALIA; SELF-MANAGEMENT; CARE; FRAMEWORK; INTERVENTIONS; TRANSLATION; SERVICES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-017-2320-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Better systems of care are required to address chronic disease in Indigenous people to ensure they can access all their care needs. Health research has produced evidence about effective models of care and chronic disease strategies to address Indigenous health, however the transfer of research findings into routine clinical practice has proven challenging. Complex interventions, such as those related to chronic disease, have many components that are often poorly implemented and hence rarely achieve implementation fidelity. Implementation fidelity is "the degree to which programs are implemented as intended by the program developer". Knowing if an intervention was implemented as planned is fundamental to knowing what has contributed to the success of an intervention. Methods: The aim of this study is to adapt the implementation fidelity framework developed by Keith et al. and apply it to the intervention implemented in phase 1 of the Getting Better at Chronic Care in North Queensland study. The objectives are to quantify the level of implementation fidelity achieved during phase 1 of the study, measure the association between implementation fidelity and health outcomes and to explore the features of the primary health care system that contributed to improved health outcomes. A convergent parallel mixed methods study design will be used to develop a process for assessing implementation fidelity. Information collected via a questionnaire and routine data generated during phase 1 of the study will be used to explain the context for the intervention in each site and develop an implementation fidelity score for each component of the intervention. A weighting will be applied to each component of the intervention to calculate the overall implementation score for each participating community. Statistical analysis will assess the level of association between implementation fidelity scores and health outcomes. Discussion: Health services research seeks to find solutions to social and technical problems to improve health outcomes. The development of a tool and methodology for assessing implementation fidelity in the Indigenous primary health care context will help address some of the barriers to the translation of research into practice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, AUSTR HLTH 2014
  • [2] Implementation Fidelity in Community-Based Interventions
    Breitenstein, Susan M.
    Gross, Deborah
    Garvey, Christine A.
    Hill, Carri
    Fogg, Louis
    Resnick, Barbara
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2010, 33 (02) : 164 - 173
  • [3] Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
    Campbell, M
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Haines, A
    Kinmonth, AL
    Sandercock, P
    Spiegelhalter, D
    Tyrer, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262): : 694 - 696
  • [4] What primary health care services should residents of rural and remote Australia be able to access? A systematic review of "core" primary health care services
    Carey, Timothy A.
    Wakerman, John
    Humphreys, John S.
    Buykx, Penny
    Lindeman, Melissa
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [5] A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity
    Carroll, Christopher
    Patterson, Malcolm
    Wood, Stephen
    Booth, Andrew
    Rick, Jo
    Balain, Shashi
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2
  • [6] Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Aron, David C.
    Keith, Rosalind E.
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    Alexander, Jeffery A.
    Lowery, Julie C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [7] Enablers and barriers to the implementation of primary health care interventions for Indigenous people with chronic diseases: a systematic review
    Gibson, Odette
    Lisy, Karolina
    Davy, Carol
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Kite, Elaine
    Lockwood, Craig
    Riitano, Dagmara
    McBride, Katharine
    Brown, Alex
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [8] Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions
    Glasgow, RE
    Nelson, CC
    Strycker, LA
    King, DK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 30 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [9] Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework
    Glasgow, RE
    Vogt, TM
    Boles, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (09) : 1322 - 1327
  • [10] The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?
    Glasgow, RE
    McKay, HG
    Piette, JD
    Reynolds, KD
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2001, 44 (02) : 119 - 127