Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies

被引:224
作者
Eiser, JR [1 ]
Miles, S
Frewer, LJ
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Ctr Res Social Attitudes, Sheffield S10 2TP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Inst Food Res, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01871.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is substantial empirical evidence that both trust and risk perceptions influence public acceptance of new technologies. We reanalyzed 3 studies (on food technology) to compare whether (a) both trust and perceived risk are independently and directly associated with acceptance, or (b) the relationship between trust and acceptance is mediated by perceived risk. In support of Interpretation a, the (negative) correlation between trust and perceived risk was reduced when controlling for acceptance, whereas the correlation between trust and acceptance was somewhat reduced when controlling for perceived risk. Controlling for trust had little effect on the correlation between perceived risk and acceptance. These findings suggest that expressions of trust and perceived risk often might be reflections of prior attitudes toward the technology.
引用
收藏
页码:2423 / 2433
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A PSYCHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED RISK AND PERCEIVED BENEFIT [J].
ALHAKAMI, AS ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1085-1096
[2]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[3]   INCORPORATING STRUCTURAL MODELS INTO RESEARCH ON THE SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION OF RISK - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY CONSTRUCTION AND DECISION-MAKING [J].
BURNS, WJ ;
SLOVIC, P ;
KASPERSON, RE ;
KASPERSON, JX ;
RENN, O ;
EMANI, S .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1993, 13 (06) :611-623
[4]  
Cvetkovich G.T., 1999, SOCIAL TRUST MANAGEM
[5]  
Dunlap R. E., 1993, PUBLIC REACTIONS NUC
[6]  
Eiser J. R., 1994, ATTITUDES CHAOS CONN
[7]   NUCLEAR ATTITUDES BEFORE AND AFTER CHERNOBYL - CHANGE AND JUDGMENT [J].
EISER, JR ;
SPEARS, R ;
WEBLEY, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 19 (08) :689-700
[8]   RISK JUDGMENTS REFLECT BELIEF STRENGTH, NOT BIAS [J].
EISER, JR .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1994, 9 (03) :197-199
[9]  
Fazio R.H., 1989, ATTITUDE STRUCTURE F
[10]  
Fazio R.H., 1995, ATTITUDE STRENGTH AN, DOI DOI 10.1521/SOCO.2007.25.5.603