From Wiens to Robel: A Review of Grassland-Bird Habitat Selection

被引:156
作者
Fisher, Ryan J. [1 ]
Davis, Stephen K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Dept Biol, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[2] Canadian Wildlife Serv, Regina, SK S4P 2K1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Daubenmire; grassland passerines; habitat models; habitat use; litter depth; vegetation density; vegetation height; vegetation structure; NEST-SITE SELECTION; SOUTHERN GREAT-PLAINS; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; NATIVE PRAIRIE; AVIAN RESPONSE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; MANAGEMENT; SPARROW; CONSERVATION; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.2193/2009-020
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Efforts to stabilize or increase grassland bird populations require identification of suitable habitat as a first step. Although the number of studies examining grassland-bird habitat selection has increased substantially in recent years, much uncertainty exists regarding local-scale habitat variables that researchers should consider. We reviewed 57 studies and identified important vegetation features correlated with grassland bird abundance, density, occurrence, and nest and territory selection. Our objectives were to 1) guide future studies of grassland-bird habitat use by providing a reduced set of relevant vegetation characteristics, 2) challenge researchers to critically think about what variables to consider, and 3) highlight the need to include consistent definitions of terms used to describe grassland bird habitat. We identified 9 variables that were important predictors of habitat use by grassland birds: coverage of bare ground (important in 50% of the instances where it was included), grass (34% of instances), dead vegetation (33% of instances), forbs (31% of instances), and litter (29% of instances), along with an index of vegetation density (39% of instances) and volume (39% of instances), litter depth (36% of instances), and vegetation height (41% of instances). Only 25% of studies provided information on effects sizes and measures of variance. Furthermore, definitions of measured habitat variables were not consistent among studies. We provide definitions of the 9 important variables and implore authors to report effect size and measures of variance. Standardization of terms and reporting of meaningful results will facilitate replication of wildlife research and enhance our ability to recognize general patterns that emerge from observational studies of habitat use.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Ahlering MA, 2006, AUK, V123, P301, DOI 10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[301:AHMMCA]2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative [J].
Anderson, DR ;
Burnham, KP ;
Thompson, WL .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 64 (04) :912-923
[4]   Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses [J].
Anderson, DR ;
Link, WA ;
Johnson, DH ;
Burnham, KP .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2001, 65 (03) :373-378
[5]  
Bajema RA, 2001, AUK, V118, P422, DOI 10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0422:RCMGAT]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Incorporating landscape attributes into models for migratory grassland bird conservation [J].
Bakker, KK ;
Naugle, DE ;
Higgins, KF .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (06) :1638-1646
[8]  
Bollinger EK, 1995, AUK, V112, P720
[9]   Taxon-dependent scaling: beetles, birds, and vegetation at four North American grassland sites [J].
Bossenbroek, JM ;
Wagner, HH ;
Wiens, JA .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2005, 20 (06) :675-688
[10]  
Brennan LA, 2005, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V69, P1, DOI 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0001:NAGBAU>2.0.CO