Trends in utilization, mortality, and resource use after implantation of left ventricular assist devices in the United States

被引:8
|
作者
Sanaiha, Yas [1 ]
Downey, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Lyons, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Nsair, Ali [3 ]
Shemin, Richard J. [1 ,2 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs CORELAB, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Cardiac Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Ahmanson UCLA Cardiomyopathy Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
left ventricular assist device; volume-outcome; trends; resource utilization; mortality; DESTINATION THERAPY; HOSPITAL VOLUME; HEART-FAILURE; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; REGISTRY; SURGEON; COST; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.121
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Adoption of implantable left ventricular assist devices has dramatically improved survival and quality of life in suitable patients with end-stage heart failure. In the era of value-based healthcare delivery, assessment of clinical outcomes and resource use associated with left ventricular assist devices is warranted. Methods: Adult patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation from 2008 to 2016 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Hospitals were designated as low-volume, medium-volume, or high-volume institutions based on annual institutional left ventricular assist device case volume. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate adjusted odds of mortality across left ventricular assist device volume tertiles. Results: Over the study period, an estimated 23,972 patients underwent left ven-tricular assist device implantation with an approximately 3-fold increase in the num-ber of annual left ventricular assist device implantations performed (P for trend<.001). In-hospital mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices decreased from 19.6% in 2008 to 8.1% in 2016 (P for trend<.001) and was higher at low-volume institutions compared with high-volume institutions (12.0% vs 9.2%, P < .001). Although the overall adjusted mortality was higher at low-volume compared with high-volume institutions (adjusted odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.15), this discrepancy was only significant for 2008 and 2009 (low-volume 2008 adjusted odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-15.8; low-volume 2009 adjusted odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.8). Conclusions: Left ventricular assist device use has rapidly increased in the United States with a concomitant reduction in mortality and morbidity. With maturation of left ventricular assist device technology and increasing experience, volume-related variation in mortality and resource use has diminished. Whether the apparent uni-formity in outcomes is related to patient selection or hospital quality deserves further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:2083 / 2090
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Bayesian Model to Predict Survival After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Kanwar, Manreet K.
    Lohmueller, Lisa C.
    Kormos, Robert L.
    Teuteberg, Jeffrey J.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Lindenfeld, JoAnn
    Bailey, Stephen H.
    McIlvennan, Colleen K.
    Benza, Raymond
    Murali, Srinivas
    Antaki, James
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 6 (09) : 771 - 779
  • [22] Abdominal Operations After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Heart Transplantation
    Sanaiha, Yas
    Xing, Hanning
    Morales, Ricardo Rosales
    Morchi, Ravi
    Ragalie, William
    Benharash, Peyman
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 243 : 481 - 487
  • [23] Readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation: Considerations for nurse practitioners
    Kaiser, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2019, 31 (07) : 396 - 402
  • [24] Stroke after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices
    Tsiouris, Athanasios
    Heliopoulos, Ioannis
    Mikroulis, Dimitrios
    Mitsias, Panayiotis D.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2019, 34 (07) : 541 - 548
  • [25] Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Survival in Patients Bridged to Transplantation with Left Ventricular Assist Devices in the United States
    Al-Kindi, Sadeer G.
    Al-Suwaidi, Jassim
    Jayyousi, Amin
    Oliveira, Guilherme H.
    Khalil, Charbel Abi
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (06) : 587 - 592
  • [26] Gender Differences in Outcomes After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Ahmed, Abdelrahman
    Adegbala, Oluwole
    Akintoye, Emmanuel
    Inampudi, Chakradhari
    Ajam, Mustafa
    Yassin, Ahmed S.
    Olawusi, Emmanuel
    Shokr, Mohamed
    Alvarez, Paulino
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 109 (03) : 780 - 786
  • [27] Left Ventricular Assist Devices Impact Hospital Resource Utilization Without Affecting Patient Mortality in Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Feng Li
    Alice Hinton
    Alan Chen
    Nishaki K. Mehta
    Samer Eldika
    Cheng Zhang
    Hisham Hussan
    Darwin L. Conwell
    Somashekar G. Krishna
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2017, 62 : 150 - 160
  • [28] Analysis of Trends and Outcomes of 90 and 180 Day Readmissions After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Ueyama, Hiroki
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Asleh, Rabea
    Briasouli, Artemis
    Doulamis, Ilias
    Malik, Aaqib H.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (03) : 356 - 362
  • [29] Thirty-Day Readmissions After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in the United States Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database
    Agrawal, Sahil
    Garg, Lohit
    Shah, Mahek
    Agarwal, Manyoo
    Patel, Brijesh
    Singh, Amitoj
    Garg, Aakash
    Jorde, Ulrich P.
    Kapur, Navin K.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 11 (03) : e004628
  • [30] Functional and haemodynamic recovery after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in comparison with pulsatile left ventricular assist devices in patients with end-stage heart failure
    Pruijsten, Ralph V.
    Lok, Sjoukje I.
    Kirkels, Hans H.
    Klopping, Corinne
    Lahpor, Jaap R.
    de Jonge, Nicolaas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2012, 14 (03) : 319 - 325