THE NONLINEAR TIME-VARYING EFFECTS OF QUANTITATIVE AND PRICE-BASED MONETARY POLICY INSTRUMENTS ON BANKING SYSTEMIC RISKS

被引:0
作者
Dou, Zhenjiang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jingyi [2 ]
Zhang, Cong [1 ]
Luo, Weiyi [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Finance, 182 Nanhu Ave, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Humanities Sci & Technol, Sch Business, 487 Dixing Rd, Loudi 417000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Dongguk Univ, Sch Management, Gyeongju 780714, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
来源
TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS | 2021年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
monetary policy; banking systemic risks; time-varying; FINANCIAL STABILITY; CAPITAL SHORTFALL; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Monetary policy and financial stability have been the focus of academic attention in recent years. Monetary policy instruments are mainly divided into quantitative and price-based types, which are heterogeneous to the mechanism and effect of systemic risk. To explore the heterogeneity of the influence of two types of monetary policy instruments on banking systemic risks, using the high-frequency return data of 16 listed commercial banks in China from January 2007 to September 2018, the long-run marginal expected shortfall method was used to measure the banking systemic risks, and on this basis, a currency combination model of the time-varying parameter factor-augmented vector autoregression was constructed. A comparative analysis of the nonlinear time-varying effects of the two types of monetary policy instruments on the systemic risks of the banks mentioned above at different macroeconomic stages was performed. Results show that monetary policy regulation has a prominent effect on banking systemic risks. The banking systemic risks tend to increase under a loose monetary policy environment regardless of whether the monetary policy instrument is quantitative or price-based type. Furthermore, the influence of monetary policy adjustment on bank systemic financial risks has nonlinear time-varying characteristics. That is, the influence of the same monetary policy instrument on banking systemic risks has nonlinear time-varying characteristics under different macroeconomic environments. The quantitative and price-based monetary policy instruments have different effects on banking systemic risks. In comparison with quantitative monetary policy instruments, the impact of price-based monetary policy instruments is greater. The conclusions have important reference value for preventing systemic financial risk
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 297
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Capital Shortfall: A New Approach to Ranking and Regulating Systemic Risks
    Acharya, Viral
    Engle, Robert
    Richardson, Matthew
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (03) : 59 - 64
  • [2] Money, Liquidity, and Monetary Policy
    Adrian, Tobias
    Shin, Hyun Song
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) : 600 - 605
  • [3] Regulations, competition and bank risk-taking in transition countries
    Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K.
    Delis, Manthos D.
    Pasiouras, Fotios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2011, 7 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [4] Monetary policy and risk taking
    Angeloni, Ignazio
    Faia, Ester
    Lo Duca, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2015, 52 : 285 - 307
  • [5] Corporate environmental performance and financing decisions
    Benlemlih, Mohammed
    Cai, Li
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2020, 29 (02) : 248 - 265
  • [6] Measuring the effects of monetary policy: A factor-augmented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach
    Bernanke, BS
    Boivin, J
    Eliasz, P
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (01) : 387 - 422
  • [7] Portfolio Investment diversification at Global stock market: A Cointegration Analysis of Emerging BRICS(P) Group
    Bhutto, Sarfaraz A.
    Ahmed, Rizwan Raheem
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Shaikh, Saifullah
    Streimikis, Justas
    [J]. ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2020, 25 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [8] Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: A missing link in the transmission mechanism?
    Borio, Claudio
    Zhu, Haibin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2012, 8 (04) : 236 - 251
  • [9] Prediction of the Future Development of Gold Price
    Brabenec, Tomas
    Suler, Petr
    Horak, Jakub
    Petras, Milos
    [J]. ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2020, 25 (02) : 250 - 262
  • [10] SRISK: A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk
    Brownlees, Christian
    Engle, Robert F.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 30 (01) : 48 - 79