Twice-daily radiotherapy as concurrent boost technique during two chemotherapy cycles in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma: Mature results of phase II study

被引:21
作者
Choi, NC
Park, SD
Lynch, T
Wright, C
Ancukiewicz, M
Wain, J
Donahue, D
Mathisen, D
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 60卷 / 01期
关键词
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; twice-daily radiotherapy; concurrent boost radiotherapy; esophageal carcinoma;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the toxicities of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using a three-drug regimen (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel) and a conventional radiotherapy (RT) schedule combined with a concurrent boost technique during chemotherapy cycles, and to determine the rate of tumor response, overall survival, and impact of pathologic tumor response on survival. Methods and Materials: The eligibility criteria included resectable adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (T2-T3N0-N1M0), performance score less than or equal to2, and no significant comorbidities for trimodality therapy. Chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel. A concurrent boost technique was used in RT for 2 levels of radiation doses: 58.5 Gy in 34 fractions within 5 weeks to the gross tumor volume and 45 Gy in 25 fractions within 5 weeks to the clinical target volume by administering a boost dose of 13.5 Gy in 9 fractions, 1.5 Gy/fraction, as a second daily fraction for 9 days on Days 1-5 and 29-32 of the chemotherapy cycles. Results: We enrolled 46 patients in the study. The paclitaxel dose was started at 75 mg/m(2) (n = 7) and escalated to 125 mg/m2 (n = 5), at which point, dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Thereafter, paclitaxel at 100 mg/m2 was used for an additional 34 patients. Toxicities included Grade 4 neutropenia (22%), febrile neutropenia requiring hospital admission (20%), Grade 3 (48%) and Grade 4 (7%) acute esophagitis, and paclitaxel-associated anaphylaxis (4%). Of the 46 patients, 3 (6.5%) died of treatment-related complications, 1 of pneumonia during induction therapy and 2 of postoperative complications (5% of the 40 patients who underwent resection). The histopathologic tumor response was a pathologic complete response (pT0N0) in 18 (45%) of 40 patients who underwent resection and 18 (39%) of all 46 registered patients. Minimal residual disease (pT1N0) at the primary site was present in 5 (11%) and residual disease in 23 (50%) of all 46 patients. The minimal follow-up for all long-term survivors (n = 16) was 5.5 years. The median survival time was 34 months, and the overall survival rate was 57%, 50%, and 37% at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (56% vs. 24%, p = 0.0214) and disease-free survival (48% vs. 6%) were significantly better statistically for patients with a pathologic complete response and minimal residual disease than for those with residual disease. All long-term survivors beyond 5.5 years without recurrence accrued from patient cohorts with a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease. Conclusion: An incorporation of twice-daily RT as a concurrent boost to the conventional daily RT schedule during chemotherapy cycles is feasible and warrants additional study for radiation dose intensification. Such research would be prudent for both improved long-term survival and organ preservation in esophageal carcinoma. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 122
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Adelstein DJ, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V80, P1011
[2]   Does paclitaxel improve the chemoradiotherapy of locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer? A nonrandomized comparison with fluorouracil-based therapy [J].
Adelstein, DJ ;
Rice, TW ;
Rybicki, LA ;
Larto, MA ;
Ciezki, J ;
Saxton, J ;
DeCamp, M ;
Vargo, JJ ;
Dumot, JA ;
Zuccaro, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (10) :2032-2039
[3]   ACTIVITY OF TAXOL IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA AND ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS [J].
AJANI, JA ;
ILSON, DH ;
DAUGHERTY, K ;
PAZDUR, R ;
LYNCH, PM ;
KELSEN, DP .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (14) :1086-1091
[4]  
Ajani JA, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V92, P279, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010715)92:2<279::AID-CNCR1320>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-2
[6]   Progress report of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal cancer: An intergroup study [J].
AlSarraf, M ;
Martz, K ;
Herskovic, A ;
Leichman, L ;
Brindle, JS ;
Vaitkevicius, VK ;
Cooper, J ;
Byhardt, R ;
Davis, L ;
Emami, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (01) :277-284
[7]  
*AM JOINT COMM CAN, 1997, AJCC CANC STAG MAN, P65
[8]   A phase II trial of preoperative combined-modality therapy for localized esophageal carcinoma: Initial results [J].
Bains, MS ;
Stojadinovic, A ;
Minsky, B ;
Rusch, V ;
Turnbull, A ;
Korst, R ;
Ginsberg, R ;
Kelsen, DP ;
Ilson, DH .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 124 (02) :270-277
[9]  
Bancewicz J, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1727
[10]   Concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for localized esophageal carcinoma [J].
Bates, BA ;
Detterbeck, FC ;
Bernard, SA ;
Qaqish, BF ;
Tepper, JE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (01) :156-163