Dosimetric comparison of pre-planned and OR-planned prostate seed brachytherapy

被引:35
作者
Wilkinson, DA
Lee, EJ
Ciezki, JP
Mohan, D
Zippe, C
Angermeier, K
Ulchaker, J
Klein, EA
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Urol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2000年 / 48卷 / 04期
关键词
prostate implants; dosimetry; OR-based treatment planning;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00734-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the dosimetry of the traditional two step procedure (volume study + treatment planning several weeks later) with that of an OR-based single procedure in which these two steps follow one another immediately, Computer generated treatment plans were used in both procedures. Methods and Materials: Several dosimetric parameters relating to target coverage were obtained from dose volume histograms of CT-based evaluation plans developed either 1 or 3 days following seed implantation. A total of 113 patients with early stage (T1C, T2A) prostate cancer were used for this retrospective study. Results: The fraction of target (prostate) covered by the prescription dose (144 Gy), 90% of the prescription dose (115 Gy), and the dose encompassing 90% of the target in the evaluation plan were all statistically significantly improved for OR-based plans compared to pre-planned cases. Conclusion: In our hands, there is a small but significant improvement in dose coverage of the prostate when the ultrasound volume study and treatment planning are combined into a single procedure. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1244
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Comparability of CT-based and TRUS-based prostate volumes [J].
Badiozamani, KR ;
Wallner, K ;
Cavanagh, W ;
Blasko, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (02) :375-378
[2]   Centralized multiinstitutional postimplant analysis for interstitial prostate brachytherapy [J].
Bice, WS ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Grimm, PD ;
Friedland, JL ;
Feygelman, V ;
Roach, M ;
Prete, JL ;
Dubois, DF ;
Blasko, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (04) :921-927
[3]   Cost comparison of radical prostatectomy and transperineal brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer [J].
Ciezki, JP ;
Klein, EA ;
Angermeier, KW ;
Ulchaker, J ;
Zippe, CD ;
Wilkinson, DA .
UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (01) :68-72
[4]   The dependence of prostate postimplant dosimetric quality on CT volume determination [J].
Merrick, GS ;
Butler, WM ;
Dorsey, AT ;
Lief, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :1111-1117
[5]   Intraoperative optimized inverse planning for prostate brachytherapy: Early experience [J].
Messing, EM ;
Zhang, JBY ;
Rubens, DJ ;
Brasacchio, RA ;
Strang, JG ;
Soni, A ;
Schell, MC ;
Okunieff, PG ;
Yu, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (04) :801-808
[6]   Evaluation of permanent I-125 prostate implants using radiography and magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Moerland, MA ;
Wijrdeman, HK ;
Beersma, R ;
Bakker, CJG ;
Battermann, JJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (04) :927-933
[7]   DOSIMETRY OF INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES - RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK GROUP NO 43 [J].
NATH, R ;
ANDERSON, LL ;
LUXTON, G ;
WEAVER, KA ;
WILLIAMSON, JF ;
MEIGOONI, AS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (02) :209-234
[8]  
Ragde H, 1997, SEMIN SURG ONCOL, V13, P438, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199711/12)13:6<438::AID-SSU8>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-B
[10]  
Ragde H, 1997, CANCER, V80, P442, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970801)80:3<442::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO