Cotton response to phosphorus fertigation using subsurface drip irrigation

被引:0
|
作者
Enciso-Medina, J.
Colaizzi, P. D.
Multer, W. L.
Stichler, C. R.
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Cooperat Extens, Texas Agr Expt Stn, Weslaco, TX 78596 USA
[2] Texas Cooperat Extens, Glasscock Cty Extens Off, Garden City, TX USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Cooperat Extens, Uvalde, TX USA
关键词
microirrigation; subsurface drip irrigation; cotton; phosphorus; fertigation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has expanded dramatically in cotton producing areas of the southwest United States, especially where furrow irrigation was practiced. There is ancillary evidence that cotton may experience shortages of phosphorus (P) and other nutrients more readily under SDI compared with furrow irrigation. This may be related to the smaller wetted volume of soil and hence smaller root volume under SDI. Some cotton producers using SDI in the Trans Pecos region of Texas have observed large increases in cotton lint yield by the addition of small amounts of P; however, cotton response to different P rates under SDI has not been documented in this region. This article presents results of a field experiment repeated during the 2003, 2004, and 2005 growing seasons where cotton lint yield, quality characteristics, and lint gross return were evaluated for different P application rates. The experiment was completely randomized with four treatments and three replications. Treatments were: 1) no phosphorus applications; 2) injection of 4.6 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in Miller Solugro (R) (12-48-8); 3) injection of 32.9 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in phosphoric acid; 4) injection of 65.7 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in phosphoric acid. The cost of P treatments ranged from $21.10 to $42.20 ha(-1) y(-1), but marginal gross returns for lint were $520 to $1,252 ha(-1) y(-1) more from phosphoric acid and $233 to $872 ha(-1) y(-1) more from Miller Solugro (R). In 2003 and 2004, lint yields and gross returns were greatest for the 65.7-kg ha(-1) y(-1) P rate, which was similar to recommended rates based on a 2004 soil fertility analysis. In 2005, lint yields and gross returns were greatest for the 32.9-kg ha(-1) y(-1) P rate, which was slightly below recommended rates based on pre-plant 2005 soil fertility analysis. These results support injecting P at rates based on soil fertility analyses. Both phosphoric acid and Miller Solugro (R) were suitable for injecting P into SDI. systems. The P2O5 application rates increased the productivity per unit of water applied during the three years of the study. Plant petiole analysis in 2004 correlated with P application rates, suggesting a qualitative method to detect P deficiencies during the growing season.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: a review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory
    Ayars, JE
    Phene, CJ
    Hutmacher, RB
    Davis, KR
    Schoneman, RA
    Vail, SS
    Mead, RM
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1999, 42 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [42] Evaluation of Drip and Subsurface Drip Irrigation in a Uniform Loamy Soil
    Rodriguez-Sinobas, Leonor
    Gil, Maria
    Sanchez, Raul
    Benitez, Javier
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2012, 177 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [43] Subsurface drip irrigation of onions: Effects of drip tape emitter spacing on yield and quality
    Enciso, Juan
    Jifon, John
    Wiedenfeld, Bob
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2007, 92 (03) : 126 - 130
  • [44] Okra Crop Response Under Subsurface Drip and Conventional Furrow Irrigation with Varying N Fertilization
    Patil, Ashish
    Tiwari, Kamlesh Narayan
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2018, 49 (19) : 2429 - 2445
  • [45] Irrigation and fertigation scheduling under drip irrigation for maize crop in sandy soil
    Ibrahim, Mahmoud M.
    El-Baroudy, Ahmed A.
    Taha, Ahmed M.
    INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2016, 30 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [46] Increasing cotton lint yield and water use efficiency for subsurface drip irrigation without mulching
    Li, Nan-nan
    Li, Jun-hong
    Shi, Xiao-juan
    Shi, Feng
    Tian, Yu
    Wang, Jun
    Hao, Xian-zhe
    Luo, Hong-hai
    Wang, Zhan-biao
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [47] Growth and sink-source relationship of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under mulched drip irrigation in response to phosphorus fertilization and cultivar
    Chen, Bolang
    Wang, Qinghui
    Tang, Xuexia
    Ye, Zupeng
    Stiles, Shane
    Feng, Gu
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2021, 45 (02) : 259 - 272
  • [48] ALFALFA PRODUCTION WITH SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION IN THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS
    Lamm, F. R.
    Harmoney, K. R.
    Aboukheira, A. A.
    Johnson, S. K.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (04) : 1203 - 1212
  • [49] Evaluation of subsurface drip irrigation design and management parameters for alfalfa
    Kandelous, Maziar M.
    Kamai, Tamir
    Vrugt, Jasper A.
    Simunek, Jiri
    Hanson, Blaine
    Hopmans, Jan W.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2012, 109 : 81 - 93
  • [50] Managing subsurface drip irrigation in the presence of shallow ground water
    Ayars, JE
    Schoneman, RA
    Dale, F
    Meso, B
    Shouse, P
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2001, 47 (03) : 243 - 264