Cotton response to phosphorus fertigation using subsurface drip irrigation

被引:0
|
作者
Enciso-Medina, J.
Colaizzi, P. D.
Multer, W. L.
Stichler, C. R.
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Cooperat Extens, Texas Agr Expt Stn, Weslaco, TX 78596 USA
[2] Texas Cooperat Extens, Glasscock Cty Extens Off, Garden City, TX USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Cooperat Extens, Uvalde, TX USA
关键词
microirrigation; subsurface drip irrigation; cotton; phosphorus; fertigation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has expanded dramatically in cotton producing areas of the southwest United States, especially where furrow irrigation was practiced. There is ancillary evidence that cotton may experience shortages of phosphorus (P) and other nutrients more readily under SDI compared with furrow irrigation. This may be related to the smaller wetted volume of soil and hence smaller root volume under SDI. Some cotton producers using SDI in the Trans Pecos region of Texas have observed large increases in cotton lint yield by the addition of small amounts of P; however, cotton response to different P rates under SDI has not been documented in this region. This article presents results of a field experiment repeated during the 2003, 2004, and 2005 growing seasons where cotton lint yield, quality characteristics, and lint gross return were evaluated for different P application rates. The experiment was completely randomized with four treatments and three replications. Treatments were: 1) no phosphorus applications; 2) injection of 4.6 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in Miller Solugro (R) (12-48-8); 3) injection of 32.9 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in phosphoric acid; 4) injection of 65.7 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in phosphoric acid. The cost of P treatments ranged from $21.10 to $42.20 ha(-1) y(-1), but marginal gross returns for lint were $520 to $1,252 ha(-1) y(-1) more from phosphoric acid and $233 to $872 ha(-1) y(-1) more from Miller Solugro (R). In 2003 and 2004, lint yields and gross returns were greatest for the 65.7-kg ha(-1) y(-1) P rate, which was similar to recommended rates based on a 2004 soil fertility analysis. In 2005, lint yields and gross returns were greatest for the 32.9-kg ha(-1) y(-1) P rate, which was slightly below recommended rates based on pre-plant 2005 soil fertility analysis. These results support injecting P at rates based on soil fertility analyses. Both phosphoric acid and Miller Solugro (R) were suitable for injecting P into SDI. systems. The P2O5 application rates increased the productivity per unit of water applied during the three years of the study. Plant petiole analysis in 2004 correlated with P application rates, suggesting a qualitative method to detect P deficiencies during the growing season.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Progression of drip irrigation and fertigation in cotton across the globe and its future perspectives for sustainable agriculture: an overview
    Vaddula, Yamini
    Singh, Kulvir
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2023, 13 (09)
  • [32] Knifing versus Injecting Phosphoric Acid with Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems
    Enciso-Medina, Juan
    Multer, Warren L.
    Wiedenfeld, Bob
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2009, 32 (11) : 1975 - 1982
  • [33] Lateral depth placement and deep tillage effects in a subsurface drip irrigation system for cotton
    Khalilian, A
    Sullivan, MJ
    Smith, WB
    NATIONAL IRRIGATION SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 641 - 646
  • [34] Effects of subsurface drip fertigation on potato growth, yield, and soil moisture dynamics
    Zhao, Guoqiang
    Luo, Xianxin
    Wang, Zhan
    Sheng, Gang
    Liu, Wei
    Wang, Yueming
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [35] Progression of drip irrigation and fertigation in cotton across the globe and its future perspectives for sustainable agriculture: an overview
    Yamini Vaddula
    Kulvir Singh
    Applied Water Science, 2023, 13
  • [36] Maize response to different subsurface drip irrigation management strategies: Yield, production functions, basal and crop evapotranspiration
    Irmak, Suat
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2024, 300
  • [37] FREQUENCY OF IRRIGATION FOR SUBSURFACE DRIP-IRRIGATED CORN
    CALDWELL, DS
    SPURGEON, WE
    MANGES, HL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1994, 37 (04): : 1099 - 1103
  • [38] Forage subsurface drip irrigation using treated swine wastewater
    Stone, K. C.
    Hunt, P. G.
    Millen, J. A.
    Johnson, M. H.
    Matheny, T. A.
    Vanotti, M. B.
    Burns, J. C.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2008, 51 (02) : 433 - 440
  • [39] Subsurface drip irrigation in California-Here to stay?
    Ayars, J. E.
    Fulton, A.
    Taylor, B.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 157 : 39 - 47
  • [40] Evaluation of humic substances fertigation through surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems on potato grown under Egyptian sandy soil conditions
    Selim, E. M.
    Mosa, A. A.
    El-Ghamry, A. M.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2009, 96 (08) : 1218 - 1222