Cotton response to phosphorus fertigation using subsurface drip irrigation

被引:0
|
作者
Enciso-Medina, J.
Colaizzi, P. D.
Multer, W. L.
Stichler, C. R.
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Cooperat Extens, Texas Agr Expt Stn, Weslaco, TX 78596 USA
[2] Texas Cooperat Extens, Glasscock Cty Extens Off, Garden City, TX USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Cooperat Extens, Uvalde, TX USA
关键词
microirrigation; subsurface drip irrigation; cotton; phosphorus; fertigation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has expanded dramatically in cotton producing areas of the southwest United States, especially where furrow irrigation was practiced. There is ancillary evidence that cotton may experience shortages of phosphorus (P) and other nutrients more readily under SDI compared with furrow irrigation. This may be related to the smaller wetted volume of soil and hence smaller root volume under SDI. Some cotton producers using SDI in the Trans Pecos region of Texas have observed large increases in cotton lint yield by the addition of small amounts of P; however, cotton response to different P rates under SDI has not been documented in this region. This article presents results of a field experiment repeated during the 2003, 2004, and 2005 growing seasons where cotton lint yield, quality characteristics, and lint gross return were evaluated for different P application rates. The experiment was completely randomized with four treatments and three replications. Treatments were: 1) no phosphorus applications; 2) injection of 4.6 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in Miller Solugro (R) (12-48-8); 3) injection of 32.9 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in phosphoric acid; 4) injection of 65.7 kg ha(-1) y(-1) P contained in phosphoric acid. The cost of P treatments ranged from $21.10 to $42.20 ha(-1) y(-1), but marginal gross returns for lint were $520 to $1,252 ha(-1) y(-1) more from phosphoric acid and $233 to $872 ha(-1) y(-1) more from Miller Solugro (R). In 2003 and 2004, lint yields and gross returns were greatest for the 65.7-kg ha(-1) y(-1) P rate, which was similar to recommended rates based on a 2004 soil fertility analysis. In 2005, lint yields and gross returns were greatest for the 32.9-kg ha(-1) y(-1) P rate, which was slightly below recommended rates based on pre-plant 2005 soil fertility analysis. These results support injecting P at rates based on soil fertility analyses. Both phosphoric acid and Miller Solugro (R) were suitable for injecting P into SDI. systems. The P2O5 application rates increased the productivity per unit of water applied during the three years of the study. Plant petiole analysis in 2004 correlated with P application rates, suggesting a qualitative method to detect P deficiencies during the growing season.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cotton response to subsurface drip irrigation frequency under deficit irrigation
    Enciso, JM
    Unruh, BL
    Colaizzi, PD
    Multer, WL
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2003, 19 (05) : 555 - 558
  • [2] COTTON RESPONSE TO CROP ROW OFFSET AND ORIENTATION TO SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION LATERALS
    Bordovsky, J. P.
    Mustian, J. T.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 28 (03) : 367 - 376
  • [3] Bitter Gourd Response to Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation under Different Fertigation Levels
    Mali, Santosh S.
    Jha, B. K.
    Singh, Ranveer
    Meena, Mukesh
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2017, 66 (04) : 615 - 625
  • [4] Effect of Subsurface Drip Irrigation on Cotton Plantations
    D. Kalfountzos
    I. Alexiou
    S. Kotsopoulos
    G. Zavakos
    P. Vyrlas
    Water Resources Management, 2007, 21 : 1341 - 1351
  • [5] Effect of subsurface drip irrigation on cotton plantations
    Kalfountzos, D.
    Alexiou, I.
    Kotsopoulos, S.
    Zavakos, G.
    Vyrlas, P.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (08) : 1341 - 1351
  • [6] Corn, Cotton, and Peanut Response to Tillage and Subsurface Drip Irrigation in North Carolina
    Jordan, D. L.
    Johnson, P. D.
    Grabow, G. L.
    Corbett, T.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (03) : 962 - 967
  • [7] Farm-Scale Processing Tomato Production Using Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Fertigation
    Tan, C. S.
    Zhang, T. Q.
    Reynolds, W. D.
    Warner, J.
    Drury, C. F.
    XI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE PROCESSING TOMATO, 2009, 823 : 77 - 81
  • [8] SOYBEAN YIELD, EVAPOTRANSPIRATION, WATER PRODUCTIVITY, AND SOIL WATER EXTRACTION RESPONSE TO SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION AND FERTIGATION
    Irmak, S.
    Specht, J. E.
    Odhiambo, L. O.
    Rees, J. M.
    Cassman, K. G.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2014, 57 (03) : 729 - 748
  • [9] Response of six processing tomato cultivars to subsurface drip fertigation
    Silva, WLC
    Giordano, LD
    Marouelli, WA
    Fontes, RR
    Gornat, B
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL ISHS SYMPOSIUM ON THE PROCESSING TOMATO - WORKSHOP ON IRRIGATION AND FERTIGATION OF PROCESSING TOMATO, 1999, (487): : 569 - 573
  • [10] Using subsurface drip irrigation for alfalfa
    Alam, M
    Trooien, TP
    Dumler, TJ
    Rogers, DH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2002, 38 (06): : 1715 - 1721