The clinical impact of the novel tumor marker DR-70 in unresectable gastric cancer patients

被引:7
作者
Hung, Yi-Ping [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ming-Huang [1 ,2 ]
Lin, June-Seng [3 ]
Hsiao, Chin-Fu [4 ]
Shan, Yan-Shen [5 ]
Chen, Yeu-Chin [6 ]
Chen, Li-Tzong [7 ]
Liu, Tsang-Wu [7 ]
Li, Chung-Pin [2 ,8 ]
Chao, Yee [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Haematol & Oncol, Dept Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Mackay Mem Hosp, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Miaoli, Taiwan
[5] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Tainan, Taiwan
[6] Tri Serv Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Natl Inst Canc Res, Tainan, Taiwan
[8] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Taipei, Taiwan
[9] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, 201,Sect 2,Shi Pai Rd, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
Chemotherapy; Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Tumor markers; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMMUNOASSAY; GUIDELINES; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS; PROGNOSIS; CEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcma.2018.01.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Gastric cancer tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), have been applied in clinical practice to screen or monitor treatment responses. However, their sensitivity and specificity are unsatisfactory. Therefore, we assessed the novel tumor marker DR-70 and evaluated its performance in screening and response monitoring. Methods: The study included newly diagnosed patients with advanced gastric cancer from March 2012 to October 2015. We measured the DR-70, CEA, and CA 19-9 levels at the time of enrollment. The patients subsequently underwent chemotherapy. We followed-up the patients every 3 months; DR-70 levels and abdominal computed tomography scans were re-evaluated and repeated, respectively, at each follow-up. The correlation between treatment response and DR-70 level after chemotherapy was analyzed. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates were also evaluated. Results: A total of 51 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled. Most (82.4%) had metastatic disease. At enrollment, the sensitivity of DR-70 in our study group was 78.4%, compared with 52.9% and 43.1% for CEA and CA 19-9, respectively. When we used the three tumor markers together, the sensitivity increased to 80.4%. We observed a correlation between treatment response and DR-70 level after chemotherapy. No difference in either overall survival or progression-free survival was observed between the DR-70 positive and negative groups. However, a trend toward poorer overall survival was observed for the high DR-70 group, although this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: DR-70 is a powerful tool not only for screening unresectable gastric cancer but also for treatment response evaluation. Copyright (C) 2018, the Chinese Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 598
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   A Phase II Study of Sequential Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Followed by Docetaxel Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Unresectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma The TCOG 3211 Clinical Trial [J].
Chen, Ming-Huang ;
Lin, Johnson ;
Hsiao, Chin-Fu ;
Shan, Yan-Shen ;
Chen, Yeu-Chin ;
Chen, Li-Tzong ;
Liu, Tsang-Wu ;
Li, Chung-Pin ;
Chao, Yee .
MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (03) :1-6
[2]   Tumor markers in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal cancers: European group on tumor markers 2014 guidelines update [J].
Duffy, M. J. ;
Lamerz, R. ;
Haglund, C. ;
Nicolini, A. ;
Kalousova, M. ;
Holubec, L. ;
Sturgeon, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 134 (11) :2513-2522
[3]  
Hou JX, 2011, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V58, P632
[4]   The new DR-70 immunoassay detects cancer of the gastrointestinal tract: a validation study [J].
Kerber, A ;
Trojan, J ;
Herrlinger, K ;
Zgouras, D ;
Caspary, WF ;
Braden, B .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 20 (09) :983-987
[5]   Serum concentration of AMDL DR-70 for the diagnosis and prognosis of carcinoma of the tongue [J].
Li, XD ;
Qiao, Z ;
Long, X ;
Wei, JX ;
Cheng, Y .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 43 (06) :513-515
[6]   DR-70 immunoassay for the surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Lin, Shan-Zu ;
Chen, Chun-Chia ;
Lee, Kuei-Chuan ;
Tseng, Chih-Wei ;
Lin, Hsiao-Yi ;
Chen, Yi-Chou ;
Lin, Han-Chieh .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03) :547-552
[7]  
Mihmanli M, 2004, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V51, P1544
[8]   Management of gastric cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines [J].
Shen, Lin ;
Shan, Yan-Shen ;
Hu, Huang-Ming ;
Price, Timothy J. ;
Sirohi, Bhawna ;
Yeh, Kun-Huei ;
Yang, Yi-Hsin ;
Sano, Takeshi ;
Yang, Han-Kwang ;
Zhang, Xiaotian ;
Park, Sook Ryun ;
Fujii, Masashi ;
Kang, Yoon-Koo ;
Chen, Li-Tzong .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (12) :E535-E547
[9]   Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association [J].
Shimada, Hideaki ;
Noie, Tamaki ;
Ohashi, Manabu ;
Oba, Koji ;
Takahashi, Yutaka .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2014, 17 (01) :26-33
[10]   ADVANTAGES OF THE AMDL-ELISA DR-70 (FDP) ASSAY OVER CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN (CEA) FOR MONITORING COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS [J].
Small-Howard, Andrea L. ;
Harris, Holden .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOASSAY & IMMUNOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 31 (02) :131-147