Continuous low-level heatwrap therapy for treating acute nonspecific low back pain

被引:74
作者
Nadler, SF
Steiner, DJ
Erasala, GN
Hengehold, DA
Abeln, SB
Weingand, KW
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Res Testing Labs Inc, Great Neck, NY USA
[3] Procter & Gamble Co, Hlth Sci Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2003年 / 84卷 / 03期
关键词
analgesia; low back pain; musculoskeletal system; rehabilitation; thermotherapy; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; FOLLOW-UP; BED REST; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2003.50102
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of 8 hours of continuous low-level heatwrap therapy for the treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain (LBP). Design: Prospective, randomized, parallel, single-blind (investigator), placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Setting: Five community-based research facilities. Participants: Two-hundred nineteen subjects, aged 18 to 55 years, with acute nonspecific LBP. Intervention: Subjects were stratified by baseline pain intensity and gender and randomized to one of the following groups: evaluation of efficacy (heatwrap, n=95; oral placebo, n=96) and blinding (oral ibuprofen, n=12; unheated back, wrap n=16). All treatments were administered for 3 consecutive days with 2 days of follow-up. Main Outcome Measures: Primary: day 1 mean pain relief (0- to 5-point verbal response scale). Secondary: muscle stiffness (101-point numeric rating scale), lateral trunk flexibility (fingertip-floor distance), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire over 3 days of treatment and 2 days of follow-up. Results: Heatwrap therapy was shown to provide significant therapeutic benefits when compared with placebo during both the treatment and follow-up period. On day 1, the heatwrap group had greater pain relief (1.76+/-.10 vs 1.05+/-.11, P<.001), less muscle stiffness (43.1 +/- 1.21 vs 47.6 +/- 1.21, P=.008), and increased flexibility (18.6 +/-.44cm vs 16.5 +/-.45cm, P=.001) compared with placebo. Disability was also reduced in the heatwrap group (5.3 vs 7.4, P=.0002). Adverse events were mild and infrequent. Conclusion: Continuous low-level heatwrap therapy was shown to be effective for the treatment of acute, nonspecific LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 334
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain [J].
Adams, MA ;
Mannion, AF ;
Dolan, P .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (23) :2497-2505
[2]  
*AM MED ASS, 1994, GUID EV PERM IMP, P126
[3]  
BIGOS SJ, 1994, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL, V14, P36
[4]  
Bombardier C, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P431
[5]  
Cameron MH., 1999, PHYS AGENTS REHABILI, P149
[6]   Functional MRI study of thalamic and cortical activations evoked by cutaneous heat, cold, and tactile stimuli [J].
Davis, KD ;
Kwan, CL ;
Crawley, AP ;
Mikulis, DJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 80 (03) :1533-1546
[7]  
DePace DM, 1996, THERMAL AGENTS REHAB, P30
[8]   HOW MANY DAYS OF BED REST FOR ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHL, AK ;
ROSENTHAL, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (17) :1064-1070
[9]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294
[10]   Patients with low back pain not returning to work - A 12-month follow-up study [J].
Haldorsen, EMH ;
Indahl, A ;
Ursin, H .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (11) :1202-1207