O2-PLS, a two-block (X-Y) latent variable regression (LVR) method with an integral OSC filter

被引:265
作者
Trygg, J
Wold, S
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Inst Mol Biosci, Smythe Grp, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Umea Univ, Chemometr Res Grp, Inst Chem, Umea, Sweden
关键词
O2-PLS; O-PLS; latent variable regression; structured noise; score-loading correspondence; model interpretation;
D O I
10.1002/cem.775
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The O2-PLS method is derived from the basic partial least squares projections to latent structures (PLS) prediction approach. The importance of the covariation matrix ((YX)-X-T) is pointed out in-relation to both the prediction model and the structured noise in both X and Y. Structured noise in X (or Y) is defined as the systematic variation of X (or Y) not linearly correlated with Y (or X). Examples in spectroscopy include baseline, drift and scatter effects. If structured noise is present in X, the existing latent variable regression (LVR) methods, e.g. PLS, will have weakened score-loading correspondence beyond the first component. This negatively affects the interpretation of model parameters such as scores and loadings. The O2-PLS method models and predicts both X and Y and has an integral orthogonal signal correction (OSC) filter that separates the structured noise in X and Y from their joint X-Y covariation used in the prediction model. This leads to a minimal number of predictive components with full score-loading correspondence and also an opportunity to interpret the structured noise. In both a real and a simulated example, O2-PLS and PLS gave very similar predictions of Y. However, the interpretation of the prediction models was clearly improved with O2-PLS, because structured noise was present. In the NIR example, O2-PLS revealed a strong water peak and baseline offset in the structured noise component. In the simulated example the O2-PLS plot of observed versus predicted Y-scores (u vs u(hat)) showed good predictions. The corresponding loading vectors provided good interpretation of the covarying analytes in X and Y. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   PLS regression methods [J].
Höskuldsson, Agnar .
Journal of Chemometrics, 1988, 2 (03) :211-228
[2]  
Box GEP., 1978, Statistics for experimenters
[3]   SIMPLS - AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES REGRESSION [J].
DEJONG, S .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1993, 18 (03) :251-263
[4]   PLS score-loading correspondence and a bi-orthogonal factorization [J].
Ergon, R .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2002, 16 (07) :368-373
[5]   Orthogonal signal correction, wavelet analysis, and multivariate calibration of complicated process fluorescence data [J].
Eriksson, L ;
Trygg, J ;
Johansson, E ;
Bro, R ;
Wold, S .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2000, 420 (02) :181-195
[6]   On orthogonal signal correction [J].
Fearn, T .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2000, 50 (01) :47-52
[7]   LINEARIZATION AND SCATTER-CORRECTION FOR NEAR-INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTRA OF MEAT [J].
GELADI, P ;
MACDOUGALL, D ;
MARTENS, H .
APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 1985, 39 (03) :491-500
[8]   A comparison of orthogonal signal correction and net analyte preprocessing methods. Theoretical and experimental study [J].
Goicoechea, HC ;
Olivieri, AC .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2001, 56 (02) :73-81
[9]   Variable and subset selection in PLS regression [J].
Höskuldsson, A .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2001, 55 (1-2) :23-38
[10]  
Hoskuldsson A., 1996, PREDICTION METHODS S, V1