A bibliometric and meta-analysis of studies on public-private partnership in China

被引:18
作者
Pu, Wang [1 ]
Xu, Fei [2 ]
Marques, Rui Cunha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, CERIS, Ave Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
China; meta-analysis; public-private partnership; bibliometric analysis; review; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; PPP PROJECTS; POLITICAL RISKS; GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES; INFRASTRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; WATER; ALLOCATION; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2021.1958356
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China is one of the countries with the highest public-private partnership (PPP) experience. Although numerous studies on PPP in China have been published in different international journals in the past decades, few relevant reviews have been found. In this research, a bibliometric analysis of 139 peer-reviewed articles on PPP in China is performed to reveal the research evolution and trend. Besides, a meta-analysis of 111 empirical articles among the total 139 articles is conducted using multinomial logistic regression to examine how data characteristics and analytical features have been utilized in this area. The major findings suggest that, first, many studies are published in the subject areas of Business, Management and Accounting, and Engineering, and most topics are discussed from the micro-level perspective. Second, the issues in the procurement phase lack enough attention. Third, for studies with different research themes, how data characteristics and analytical features have been utilized significantly differ. In general, how PPP studies are approached in China contrasts with the global PPP research. Future research directions are proposed. The research contributes to the global PPP body of knowledge and methodology by providing the first quantitative review of studies on PPP in China and by combining the research methods.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 789
页数:17
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Risk assessment framework of PPP-megaprojects focusing on risk interaction and project success
    Ahmadabadi, Ali Akbari
    Heravi, Gholamreza
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 124 : 169 - 188
  • [2] Al-Sharif F., 2004, ARCOM 20th Annual Conference, P711
  • [3] How Much Vertical Integration? Contractual Choice and Public-Private Partnerships in the United States
    Albalate, Daniel
    Bel, Germa
    Geddes, R. Richard
    [J]. REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2017, 51 (01) : 25 - 42
  • [4] Accounting-related research in PPPs/PFIs: present contributions and future opportunities
    Andon, Paul
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2012, 25 (05): : 876 - 924
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, REVIEW
  • [6] Current Status of Public-Private Partnership Research: Academia Fails to Provide Added Value for Industry
    Badasyan, Norayr
    Riemann, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2020, 26 (01)
  • [7] Review of Public-Private Partnership Literature from a Project Lifecycle Perspective
    Bao, Fengyu
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Chen, Chuan
    Darko, Amos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2018, 24 (03)
  • [8] Barley SR, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P16
  • [9] Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper Than Public Production? A Meta-Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services
    Bel, Germa
    Fageda, Xavier
    Warner, Mildred E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 29 (03) : 553 - 577
  • [10] Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a benchmarking literature survey
    Berg, Sanford V.
    Marques, Rui Cunha
    [J]. WATER POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) : 591 - 606