Opportunity Neglect: An Aversion to Low-Probability Gains

被引:1
|
作者
Prinsloo, Emily [1 ]
Barasz, Kate [2 ]
John, Leslie K. [1 ]
Norton, Michael, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard Business Sch, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Ramon Llull, ESADE, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
risk taking; decision making; choice; motivation; open data; open materials; preregistered; PREFERENCE REVERSALS; SEPARATE EVALUATIONS; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK; DECISION; UNCERTAINTY; DEFAULTS; JOINT;
D O I
10.1177/09567976221091801
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Seven preregistered studies (N = 2,890, adult participants) conducted in the field, in the lab, and online documented opportunity neglect: a tendency to reject opportunities with low probability of success even when they come with little or no objective cost (e.g., time, money, reputation). Participants rejected a low-probability opportunity in an everyday context (Study 1). Participants also rejected incentive-compatible gambles with positive expected value-for both goods (Study 2) and money (Studies 3-7)-even with no possibility of monetary loss and nontrivial rewards (e.g., a 1% chance at $99). Participants rejected low-probability opportunities more frequently than high-probability opportunities with equal expected value (Study 3). Although taking some real-life opportunities comes with costs, we show that people are even willing to incur costs to opt out of low-probability opportunities (Study 4). Opportunity neglect can be mitigated by highlighting that rejecting an opportunity is equivalent to choosing a zero probability of success (Studies 6-7).
引用
收藏
页码:1857 / 1866
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-probability rational spillovers
    Kivi, Paul A.
    Shogren, Jason F.
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2011, 110 (01) : 25 - 27
  • [2] Insurance decisions for low-probability losses
    Susan K. Laury
    Melayne Morgan McInnes
    J. Todd Swarthout
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2009, 39 : 17 - 44
  • [3] Insurance decisions for low-probability losses
    Laury, Susan K.
    McInnes, Melayne Morgan
    Swarthout, J. Todd
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2009, 39 (01) : 17 - 44
  • [4] Risk attitudes to low-probability climate change risks: WTP for flood insurance
    Botzen, W. J. W.
    van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 82 (01) : 151 - 166
  • [5] Dynamics in risk taking with a low-probability hazard
    Royal, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2017, 55 (01) : 41 - 69
  • [6] Risk Dishabituation: In Repeated Gambling, Risk Is Reduced Following Low-Probability "Surprising" Events (Wins or Losses)
    Demaree, Heath A.
    Burns, Kevin J.
    DeDonno, Michael A.
    Agarwala, Edward K.
    Everhart, D. Erik
    EMOTION, 2012, 12 (03) : 495 - 502
  • [7] Risk when some states are low-probability events
    Hinich, MJ
    MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2003, 7 (04) : 636 - 643
  • [8] Protecting Against Low-Probability Disasters: The Role of Worry
    Schade, Christian
    Kunreuther, Howard
    Koellinger, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 25 (05) : 534 - 543
  • [9] Decision-making for civil infrastructure exposed to low-probability, high-consequence hazards: The role of risk-aversion
    Cha, E. J.
    Ellingwood, B. R.
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, : 840 - 847
  • [10] Why does myopia decrease the willingness to invest? Is it myopic loss aversion or myopic loss probability aversion?
    Zeisberger, Stefan
    Langer, Thomas
    Weber, Martin
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2012, 72 (01) : 35 - 50