Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages

被引:68
作者
Hammerl, Jens A. [1 ]
Jaeckel, Claudia [1 ]
Alter, Thomas [2 ]
Janzcyk, Pawel [1 ]
Stingl, Kerstin [1 ]
Knuever, Marie Theres [1 ]
Hertwig, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bundesinst Risikobewertung, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
BACTERIOPHAGE; COLI; COLONIZATION; INFECTION; PATHOGENS; EFFICACY; SURFACE; SKIN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0114785
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Bacteriophage treatment is a promising tool to reduce Campylobacter in chickens. Several studies have been published where group II or group III phages were successfully applied. However, these two groups of phages are different regarding their host ranges and host cell receptors. Therefore, a concerted activity of group II and group III phages might enhance the efficacy of a treatment and decrease the number of resistant bacteria. Results: In this study we have compared the lytic properties of some group II and group III phages and analysed the suitability of various phages for a reduction of C. jejuni in broiler chickens. We show that group II and group III phages exhibit different kinetics of infection. Two group III and one group II phage were selected for animal experiments and administered in different combinations to three groups of chickens, each containing ten birds. While group III phage CP14 alone reduced Campylobacter counts by more than 1 log(10) unit, the concomitant administration of a second group III phage (CP81) did not yield any reduction, probably due to the development of resistance induced by this phage. One group of chickens received phage CP14 and, 24 hours later, group II phage CP68. In this group of animals, Campylobacter counts were reduced by more than 3 log10 units. Conclusion: The experiments illustrated that Campylobacter phage cocktails have to be carefully composed to achieve the best results.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective [J].
Humphrey, Tom ;
O'Brien, Sarah ;
Madsen, Mogens .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 117 (03) :237-257
[22]   A suggested classification for two groups of Campylobacter myoviruses [J].
Javed, Muhammad Afzal ;
Ackermann, Hans-Wolfgang ;
Azeredo, Joana ;
Carvalho, Carla M. ;
Connerton, Ian ;
Evoy, Stephane ;
Hammerl, Jens Andr ;
Hertwig, Stefan ;
Lavigne, Rob ;
Singh, Amit ;
Szymanski, Christine M. ;
Timms, Andrew ;
Kropinski, Andrew M. .
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2014, 159 (01) :181-190
[23]   Effect of Bacteriophage Application on Campylobacter jejuni Loads in Commercial Broiler Flocks [J].
Kittler, Sophie ;
Fischer, Samuel ;
Abdulmawjood, Amir ;
Gluender, Gerhard ;
Klein, Guenter .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 79 (23) :7525-7533
[24]   Campylobacter in poultry:: Filling an ecological niche [J].
Lee, MD ;
Newell, DG .
AVIAN DISEASES, 2006, 50 (01) :1-9
[25]  
Loc-Carrillo CM, 2004, THESIS U NOTTINGHAM
[26]   Campylobacter [J].
Moore, JE ;
Corcoran, D ;
Dooley, JSG ;
Fanning, S ;
Lucey, B ;
Matsuda, M ;
McDowell, DA ;
Mégraud, F ;
Millar, BC ;
O'Mahony, R ;
O'Riordan, L ;
O'Rourke, M ;
Rao, JR ;
Rooney, PJ ;
Sails, A ;
Whyte, P .
VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (03) :351-382
[27]  
Orquera Stefanie, 2012, J Mol Genet Med, V6, P273
[28]   Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens [J].
Rosenquist, H ;
Nielsen, NL ;
Sommer, HM ;
Norrung, B ;
Christensen, BB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 83 (01) :87-103
[29]   Characterisation of 16 Campylobacter jejuni and C-coli typing bacteriophages [J].
Sails, AD ;
Wareing, DRA ;
Bolton, FJ ;
Fox, AJ ;
Curry, A .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 47 (02) :123-128
[30]  
Scott AE, 2007, ENVIRON MICROBIOL, V9, P2341, DOI [10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01351.x, 10.1111/J.1462-2920.2007.01351.x]