The unseen hands: Collaborative instrumental leadership in the British renegotiation case

被引:9
作者
Beach, Derek [1 ]
Smeets, Sandrino [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle 7,Bldg 1332,222, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Res Methodol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Polit Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
EU institutions; principal-agent theory; major reforms; UK renegotiation; EUROPEAN COUNCIL; INTEGRATION; COMMISSION; GOVERNANCE; CRISIS;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6765.12354
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The article contends that an important but overlooked explanation for the European Union's resilience in the past decade in the face of several existential crises has been the informal instrumental leadership roles played by EU institutional actors collaborating with each other. In this article, a theoretical framework is developed that can explain why EU governments, facing a crisis, would choose to informally delegate leadership tasks to a set of EU institutional actors. A three-part mechanism of collaborative instrumental leadership provided by institutions is devised that explains why governments informally delegate leadership tasks to EU institutions, and the effects of this informal delegation. The core of the article is a process-tracing case study that explores how collaborative instrumental leadership actually works. The case selected is the British renegotiation of their terms of membership in 2015-2016. While the case has become more-or-less forgotten because the shock 'no' vote in the June 2016 Brexit referendum made its terms moot, the deal included quite exceptional reform proposals in which the EU bent over backwards to accommodate the United Kingdom, perhaps even going beyond the bounds of the EU Treaties themselves in the issue of immigration. Given this, analysing how collaborative instrumental leadership supplied by institutions contributed to producing the ambitious deal can shed light on the processes whereby intractable problems in the EU have been solved in the past decade.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 464
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES 0122
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT HDB INFORMAL GOV
[3]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[4]  
Armstrong KA, 2017, BREXIT TIME: LEAVING THE EU - WHY, HOW AND WHEN?, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781108233385
[5]  
Beach D., 2019, Process Tracing: Foundations and Guidelines
[6]   The Commission: boxed in and constrained, but still an engine of integration [J].
Becker, Stefan ;
Bauer, Michael W. ;
Connolly, Sara ;
Kassim, Hussein .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2016, 39 (05) :1011-1031
[7]   The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era [J].
Bickerton, Christopher J. ;
Hodson, Dermot ;
Puetter, Uwe .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2015, 53 (04) :703-722
[8]   An elephant on the 13th floor of the Berlaymont? European Council and Commission relations in legislative agenda setting [J].
Bocquillon, Pierre ;
Dobbels, Mathias .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 21 (01) :20-38
[9]   From EU Governance of Crisis to Crisis of EU Governance: Regulatory Failure, Redistributive Conflict and Eurosceptic Publics [J].
Borzel, Tanja A. .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2016, 54 :8-31
[10]   Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis [J].
Calanni, John C. ;
Siddiki, Saba N. ;
Weible, Christopher M. ;
Leach, William D. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2015, 25 (03) :901-927