EU Investors versus EU States: International Arbitration of Investment Disputes

被引：3

作者：

Donaubauer, Julian ^{[1
]}

Nunnenkamp, Peter ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Helmut Schmidt Univ Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

[2] Kiel Inst World Econ, Kiellinie 66, D-24105 Kiel, Germany

来源：

JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES | 2018年 / 56卷 / 06期

关键词：

investor-state dispute settlement; arbitration tribunals; intra-EU disputes; appointment bias of arbitrators; LAW; PATTERNS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; RULE;

D O I：

10.1111/jcms.12748

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Recent information on investor-state dispute settlement, collected by UNCTAD, suggests that European investors are more litigious than non-European investors. Most of the intra-EU claims for financial compensation are directed at relatively poor respondent states in Central Europe. However, private investors win surprisingly few intra-EU disputes. The appointment bias of arbitrators and the composition of tribunals appear to matter for the outcome of investor-state dispute settlement.

引用

页码：1376 / 1393

页数：18

共 27 条

[1] Bilateral investment treaties as deterrents of host-country discretion: the impact of investor-state disputes on foreign direct investment in developing countries [J].