ON THE SELF-REFERENCE OF YABLO'S PARADOX

被引：2

作者：

Domanov, Oleg A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Inst Philosophy & Law, Novosibirsk, Russia

来源：

VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA-SOTSIOLOGIYA-POLITOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY SOCIOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE | 2019年 / 50卷

关键词：

Yablo's paradox; self-reference; non-well-founded sets;

D O I：

10.17223/1998863X/50/21

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

Evgeny Borisov's argument against Bueno and Colyvan is not correct. At the same time, their approach is not free of problems as well, as Jeffrey Ketland demonstrated. The arguments Borisov discusses along with approaches based on the theory of non-well-founded sets show that one of the principal problems in the debate on Yablo's paradox consists in the obscurity of the concept of self-reference.

引用

页码：245 / 248

页数：4

共 6 条

[1] Aczel P., 1988, Non-well-founded sets
[2] Paradox without satisfaction (Liar paradox, circularity)
Bueno, O
Colyvan, M
[J]. ANALYSIS, 2003, 63 (02) : 152 - 156
[3] Cook R. T., 2014, YABLO PARADOX ESSAY
[4] There are non-circular paradoxes (but Yablo's isn't one of them!)
Cook, Roy T.
[J]. MONIST, 2006, 89 (01) : 118 - 149
[5] Yablo's Paradox and ω-inconsistency
Ketland, J
[J]. SYNTHESE, 2005, 145 (03) : 295 - 302
[6] Yablo's paradox
Priest, G
[J]. ANALYSIS, 1997, 57 (04) : 236 - 242

← 1 →