Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research

被引:219
作者
Nagin, D
Paternoster, R
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Natl Consortium Violence Res, Dept Criminol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Natl Consortium Violence Res, Heinz Sch Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
heterogeneity; dependence;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007502804941
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Criminological research has consistently uncovered a positive correlation between past and current criminal behavior. Continuity in offending over time can be attributed to at least two processes-population heterogeneity and state dependence. A population heterogeneity process attributes stability in offending over time to differences in an anti-social characteristic (self-control, impulsivity, psychopathic personality) across persons that is established early in life and time-stable thereafter. An implication of a population heterogeneity explanation for continuity in offending over time is that the anti-social characteristic is likely to have reverberations throughout life, taking many manifestations later in life (unemployment, drug addiction, marital instability). Any observed correlation between these later life events and criminality, therefore, is spurious rather than causal, due to the fact that they are all the effects of a common cause. A state dependence explanation, in contrast, attributes observed stability in criminal offending to a process of contagion. That is, criminal behavior has a genuine causal effect on subsequent criminality by eroding constraints and strengthening incentives to crime. The implication of a state dependence process is that criminal conduct may be influenced by later life events. In this paper, we draw a connection between population heterogeneity and state dependence processes and extant criminological theory. We also review the literature that has investigated the plausibility of these two processes. Finally, concluding that we know very little about them we make recommendations for future research on population heterogeneity and state dependence.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 144
页数:28
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY [J].
AGNEW, R .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) :47-87
[2]  
Akers R.L., 1985, Deviant behavior: A social learning approach, V3rd
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, WORK DISAPPEARS
[4]  
Becker H., 1963, Outsiders
[5]   On the use of panel research designs and random effects models to investigate static and dynamic theories of criminal offending [J].
Brame, R ;
Bushway, S ;
Paternoster, R .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1999, 37 (03) :599-641
[6]   Assessing stability and change in criminal offending: A comparison of random effects, semiparametric, and fixed effects modeling strategies [J].
Bushway, S ;
Brame, R ;
Paternoster, R .
JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 1999, 15 (01) :23-61
[7]   The impact of an arrest on the job stability of young white American men [J].
Bushway, SD .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 1998, 35 (04) :454-479
[8]   ARE SOME PEOPLE CRIME-PRONE - REPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONALITY-CRIME RELATIONSHIP ACROSS COUNTRIES, GENDERS, RACES, AND METHODS [J].
CASPI, A ;
MOFFITT, TE ;
SILVA, PA ;
STOUTHAMERLOEBER, M ;
KRUEGER, RF ;
SCHMUTTE, PS .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1994, 32 (02) :163-195
[9]  
CASPI A, 1993, MANUAL DEV
[10]  
Cleckley H., 1976, The mask of sanity, V4th