The PSA testing dilemma: GPs' reports of consultations with asymptomatic men: a qualitative study

被引:25
作者
Clements, Alison
Watson, Eila
Rai, Tanvi
Bukach, Colleen
Shine, Brian
Austoker, Joan
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Hlth Care, Canc Res UK Primary Care Educ Res Grp, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2296-8-35
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The National Health Service Prostate Cancer Risk Management Programme (PCRMP) has recommended that screening for prostate cancer is available for asymptomatic men, on the understanding that they have been provided with full and balanced information about the advantages and limitations of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Guidance has been distributed to all GPs in England and Wales to assist in the provision of information to men. This study aimed to elicit GPs' accounts of their discussions with asymptomatic men who consult with concerns about prostate cancer in order to identify the degree to which the PCRMP guidance was reflected in these consultations. Methods: Qualitative interview study. Semi-structured telephone interviews with 21 GPs from 18 GP practices in Oxfordshire. Results: All GPs reported undertaking some discussion with asymptomatic men about the PSA test. They described focussing most of the discussion on the false-positive and false-negative rates of the test, and the risks associated with a prostate biopsy. They reported less discussion of the potential for diagnosing indolent cancers, the dilemmas regarding treatment options for localised prostate cancer and the potential benefits of testing. Considerable variation existed between GPs in their accounts of the degree of detail given, and GP's presentation of information appeared to be affected by their personal views of the PSA test. Conclusion: The GPs in this study appear to recognise the importance of discussions regarding PSA testing; however, a full and balanced picture of the associated advantages and limitations does not seem to be consistently conveyed. Factors specific to PSA testing which appeared to have an impact on the GPs' discussions were the GP's personal opinions of the PSA test, and the need to counter men's primarily positive views of the benefits of PSA testing. Awareness of the impact of their views on the consultations may help GPs give men a more balanced presentation of the benefits and limitations of the PSA test.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Anal Qual Data, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JPSYCHORES.2008.12.001
[2]  
[Anonymous], NHS PROST CANC PROGR
[3]   Communicating prostate cancer risk: what should we be telling our patients? [J].
Baade, PD ;
Steginga, SK ;
Pinnock, CB ;
Aitken, JF .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2005, 182 (09) :472-475
[4]   Screening for prostate cancer: Recommendation and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, P ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (11) :915-916
[5]  
*CANC RES UK, 2006, CANC PROST CANC UK
[6]   Brief report: Physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen [J].
Chan, ECY ;
Barry, MJ ;
Vernon, SW ;
Ahn, C .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (03) :257-259
[7]   To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians' use of the PSA test [J].
Cooper, CP ;
Merritt, TL ;
Ross, LE ;
John, LV ;
Jorgensen, CM .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 38 (02) :182-191
[8]   Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials:: Program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial [J].
de Koning, HJ ;
Auvinen, A ;
Sanchez, AB ;
da Silva, FC ;
Ciatto, S ;
Denis, L ;
Gohagan, JK ;
Hakama, M ;
Hugosson, J ;
Kranse, R ;
Nelen, V ;
Prorok, PC ;
Schröder, FH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 97 (02) :237-244
[9]  
FRANKEL S, 2003, LANCET, V95, P16
[10]   RIGOUR AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH [J].
MAYS, N ;
POPE, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (6997) :109-112