Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention study

被引:116
作者
Xu, Lin [1 ]
Ling, Maoliang [1 ]
Wu, Yiling [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Household waste separation; Collective action; Economic incentive; Social influence; Self-efficacy; Personal norms; COLLECTIVE ACTION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; ENERGY-CONSERVATION; SAVING ELECTRICITY; RECYCLING BEHAVIOR; POLITICAL-ACTION; RATIONAL CHOICE; NORMS; SPILLOVER; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China has experienced a rapid growth of solid waste over the years, household waste source-separation is becoming a nationwide strategy for promoting recycling economy and improving urban environmental sustainability. Waste separation, however, may end in failure due to the free-rider problem similarly existing in other pro-environmental collective actions. Along with the economic and sociological/social psychological logic respectively, this study tested the effects of economic incentive and social influence, which are theoretically considered as two general solutions to domestic waste separation dilemma. One hundred and eighty-eight residents in the three communities of Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province were assigned to a control group or one of two experimental scenarios, where they were encouraged to participate in waste separation activities through either the economic rewards given on their performance, or door-stepping campaigns aimed at constructing a supportive social environment. Six-month intervention effects were analyzed and showed that economic inducement was more effective than social mobilization in promoting waste separation. Further mediation tests indicated that self-efficacy partially mediated the effects of both strategies, while personal norms were positively associated with two treatments instead of behavior demonstration. In addition, the moderating effects of several socio-demographic factors on psychological mechanisms were also explored. The findings, limitations and implications for future research and policy are discussed in the concluding section. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 531
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
Olson M., 1965, LOGIC COLLECTIVE ACT
[32]   Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-Analysis of Proenvironmental Behavior Experiments [J].
Osbaldiston, Richard ;
Schott, John Paul .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2012, 44 (02) :257-299
[33]   A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action [J].
Ostrom, E .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1998, 92 (01) :1-22
[34]   Collective action and the evolution of social norms [J].
Ostrom, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 14 (03) :137-158
[35]  
Ostrom E., 1990, SO EC J, V60, P249
[36]   Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behaviour [J].
Pakpour, Amir H. ;
Zeidi, Isa Mohammadi ;
Emamjomeh, Mohammad Mahdi ;
Asefzadeh, Saeed ;
Pearson, Heidi .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (06) :980-986
[38]   Monetary or environmental appeals for saving electricity? -Potentials for spillover on low carbon policy acceptability [J].
Steinhorst, Julia ;
Matthies, Ellen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 :335-344
[39]   Saving electricity - For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing [J].
Steinhorst, Julia ;
Klockner, Christian A. ;
Matthies, Ellen .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 43 :125-135
[40]   Influence of recycling programmes on waste separation behaviour [J].
Stoeva, Katya ;
Alriksson, Stina .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 68 :732-741