Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention study

被引:116
作者
Xu, Lin [1 ]
Ling, Maoliang [1 ]
Wu, Yiling [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Household waste separation; Collective action; Economic incentive; Social influence; Self-efficacy; Personal norms; COLLECTIVE ACTION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; ENERGY-CONSERVATION; SAVING ELECTRICITY; RECYCLING BEHAVIOR; POLITICAL-ACTION; RATIONAL CHOICE; NORMS; SPILLOVER; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China has experienced a rapid growth of solid waste over the years, household waste source-separation is becoming a nationwide strategy for promoting recycling economy and improving urban environmental sustainability. Waste separation, however, may end in failure due to the free-rider problem similarly existing in other pro-environmental collective actions. Along with the economic and sociological/social psychological logic respectively, this study tested the effects of economic incentive and social influence, which are theoretically considered as two general solutions to domestic waste separation dilemma. One hundred and eighty-eight residents in the three communities of Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province were assigned to a control group or one of two experimental scenarios, where they were encouraged to participate in waste separation activities through either the economic rewards given on their performance, or door-stepping campaigns aimed at constructing a supportive social environment. Six-month intervention effects were analyzed and showed that economic inducement was more effective than social mobilization in promoting waste separation. Further mediation tests indicated that self-efficacy partially mediated the effects of both strategies, while personal norms were positively associated with two treatments instead of behavior demonstration. In addition, the moderating effects of several socio-demographic factors on psychological mechanisms were also explored. The findings, limitations and implications for future research and policy are discussed in the concluding section. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 531
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation [J].
Abrahamse, W ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C ;
Rothengatter, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :273-291
[2]   Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis [J].
Abrahamse, Wokje ;
Steg, Linda .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06) :1773-1785
[3]  
Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior
[4]   USING COUPON INCENTIVES IN RECYCLING ALUMINUM - A MARKET APPROACH TO ENERGY-CONSERVATION POLICY [J].
ALLEN, J ;
DAVIS, D ;
SOSKIN, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 1993, 27 (02) :300-318
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, J APPL SOCIAL PSYCHO, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[6]   Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially [J].
Ariely, Dan ;
Bracha, Anat ;
Meier, Stephan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (01) :544-555
[7]  
Bandura A., 1977, Social learning theory
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]   The outer influence inside us: Exploring the relation between social and personal norms [J].
Bertoldo, Raquel ;
Castro, Paula .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 112 :45-53
[10]   Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: A case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand [J].
Boonrod, K. ;
Towprayoon, S. ;
Bonnet, S. ;
Tripetchkul, S. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 95 :77-90