Using an integrative mock-up simulation approach for evidence-based evaluation of operating room design prototypes

被引:49
作者
Bayramzadeh, Sara [1 ]
Joseph, Anjali [1 ]
Allison, David [1 ]
Shultz, Jonas [2 ,5 ]
Abernathy, James [3 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Sch Architecture Lee 2, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Hlth Qual Council Alberta, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Johns Hopkins Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, 1800 Orleans St,Zayed 6208, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Smartstate South Carolina Ctr Econ Excellence, Ctr Hlth Facil Design & Testing, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[5] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Operating room; Mock-up; Mock-up evaluation; Multidisciplinary design evaluation; Design communication; Simulation; DECISION-MAKING; FACILITY DESIGN; SAFETY; SURGERY; INVOLVEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; ERGONOMICS; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.011
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper describes the process and tools developed as part of a multidisciplinary collaborative simulation based approach for iterative design and evaluation of operating room (OR) prototypes. Full-scale physical mock-ups of healthcare spaces offer an opportunity to actively communicate with and to engage multidisciplinary stakeholders in the design process. While mock-ups are increasingly being used in healthcare facility design projects, they are rarely evaluated in a manner to support active user feedback and engagement. Researchers and architecture students worked closely with clinicians and architects to develop OR design prototypes and engaged clinical end-users in simulated scenarios. An evaluation toolkit was developed to compare design prototypes. The mock-up evaluation helped the team make key decisions about room size, location of OR table, infra-room zoning, and doors location. Structured simulation based mock-up evaluations conducted in the design process can help stakeholders visualize their future workspace and provide active feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 299
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Ambulatory movements, team dynamics and interactions during robot-assisted surgery [J].
Ahmad, Nabeeha ;
Hussein, Ahmed A. ;
Cavuoto, Lora ;
Sharif, Mohamed ;
Allers, Jenna C. ;
Hinata, Nobuyuki ;
Ahmad, Basel ;
Kozlowski, Justen D. ;
Hashmi, Zishan ;
Bisantz, Ann ;
Guru, Khurshid A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (01) :132-139
[2]  
Allison David, 2015, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
[3]   Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections [J].
Beldi, Guido ;
Bisch-Knaden, Sonja ;
Banz, Vanessa ;
Muehlemann, Kathrin ;
Candinas, Daniel .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (02) :157-162
[4]   Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept [J].
Broom, M. A. ;
Capek, A. L. ;
Carachi, P. ;
Akeroyd, M. A. ;
Hilditch, G. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (03) :175-179
[5]   Preventing surgical-site infections: Measures other than antibiotics [J].
Chauveaux, D. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (01) :S77-S83
[6]   Human Factors and Operating Room Safety [J].
ElBardissi, Andrew W. ;
Sundt, Thoralf M. .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 92 (01) :21-+
[7]  
Facilities Guidelines Institute, 2014, 2014 FGI GUID DES CO
[8]   Efficiency improvement in the operating room [J].
Fong, Abigail J. ;
Smith, Meghan ;
Langerman, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 204 (02) :371-383
[9]  
Health Quality Council of Alberta (HQCA), 2016, SIM BAS MOCK UP EV F
[10]   The architecture of safety: hospital design [J].
Joseph, Anjali ;
Rashid, Mahbub .
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 13 (06) :714-719