Perforation after rigid pharyngo-oesophagoscopy: when do symptoms and signs develop?

被引:6
作者
Daniel, M. [1 ]
Kamani, T. [2 ]
Nogueira, C. [2 ]
Jaberoo, M-C [3 ]
Conboy, P. [4 ]
Johnston, M. [2 ]
Bradley, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] Derbyshire Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Derby, England
[3] St Bartholomews Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, London, England
[4] Univ Hosp Leicester, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
Oesophagoscopy; Oesophageal Perforation; Complications; ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1017/S0022215109991629
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Perforation after pharyngo-oesophagoscopy is a Serious complication, and its identification, through close patient monitoring, is essential. Yet little is known about when symptoms and signs develop, and thus how long any close monitoring should last. Aim: To examine the timing of individual symptoms and signs of perforation after rigid pharyngo-oesophagoscopy. Methodology: Three-centre, retrospective Study. Results: Of 3459 patients undergoing rigid pharyngo-oesophagoscopy, 10 (0.29 per cent) developed perforations, nine of which were suspected intra-operatively. Symptoms and signs developed at 1.5 hours post-operatively at the earliest, and at 36 hours at the latest. Three patients were asymptomatic. The majority of procedures (n = 8) were undertaken for food bolus obstruction or foreign body ingestion. Conclusion: Pharyngo-oesophagoscopy for food bolus obstruction and foreign body ingestion accounts for a large number of perforations, but Symptoms and signs may take longer than 24 hours to develop. A contrast swallow should be considered in high risk patients, and a high index of suspicion maintained in order to detect this complication.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 174
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Braghetto I, 2005, REV MED CHILE, V133, P1233
[2]   Esophageal perforation: Comparison of use of aqueous and barium-containing contrast media [J].
Buecker, A ;
Wein, BB ;
Neuerburg, JM ;
Guenther, RW .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (03) :683-686
[3]  
*COMM PROV SURG SE, 1992, GUID DAY CAS SURG
[4]  
Galloway JM, 2002, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V52, P536
[5]   PERFORATION OF THE ESOPHAGUS - CORRELATION OF SITE AND CAUSE WITH PLAIN FILM FINDINGS [J].
HAN, SY ;
MCELVEIN, RB ;
ALDRETE, JS ;
TISHLER, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1985, 145 (03) :537-540
[6]   Esophageal perforation: Principles of diagnosis and surgical management [J].
Huber-Lang, M ;
Henne-Bruns, D ;
Schmitz, B ;
Wuerl, P .
SURGERY TODAY, 2006, 36 (04) :332-340
[7]  
Kubba Haytham, 2003, Ear Nose Throat J, V82, P33
[8]   OPERATIVE AND NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATIONS [J].
MICHEL, L ;
GRILLO, HC ;
MALT, RA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1981, 194 (01) :57-63
[9]   Surgical aspects of esophageal disease - Perforation and caustic injury [J].
Zwischenberger, JB ;
Savage, C ;
Bidani, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 165 (08) :1037-1040