Marketing's integration with other departments

被引:194
作者
Kahn, KB
Mentzer, JT
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Management, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00068-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Interdepartmental integration is very much a part of a marketing department's activities, but what is meant by "integration" is not well defined. Some literature has ascribed to an interaction perspective, where meetings and documented information exchange predicate marketing's relationships among departments. Other literature has ascribed to a collaboration perspective, where teams and collective goals are prescribed. And a third group of literature has suggested that integration is a composite of interaction and collaboration. An empirical study of 514 marketing, manufacturing, and RGD managers was undertaken to investigate which one of these perspectives may be more valid for achieving performance success. Findings indicate that collaboration distinguishes successful performance and promotes marketing's satisfaction in working with other departments. Managerial and future research implications are discussed. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 62
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1965, PRODUCT INNOVATION O
[2]  
[Anonymous], J ACAD MARKETING SCI
[3]   EVOLVING DEFINITION OF COLLABORATION AND SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR WORLD OF WORK [J].
APPLEY, DG ;
WINDER, AE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1977, 13 (03) :279-291
[4]   ASPECTS OF THE INTEGRATION OF TECHNICAL FUNCTIONS FOR EFFICIENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT [J].
CARLSSON, M .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1991, 21 (01) :55-66
[5]   PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPING BETTER MEASURES OF MARKETING CONSTRUCTS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1979, 16 (01) :64-73
[6]  
Clark K.B., 1991, PRODUCT DEV PERFORMA
[7]  
DAFT RL, 1984, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V6, P191
[8]  
DOUGHERTY D, 1987, THESIS MIT
[9]  
Galbraith J., 1977, ORG DESIGN
[10]   CONDITIONS FACILITATING INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION [J].
GRAY, B .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1985, 38 (10) :911-936