Social Outcomes of Community-based Rangeland Management in Mongolian Steppe Ecosystems

被引:33
|
作者
Ulambayar, Tungalag [1 ]
Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E. [2 ]
Baival, Batkhishig [3 ]
Batjav, Batbuyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Mongolian Inst Geog & Geoecol, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Forest & Rangeland Stewardship, Campus Mail 1472, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Nutag Partners, Usnii St, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2017年 / 10卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Community-based natural resource management; community-based conservation; pastoralism; integrated conservation and development; common pool resources; common property; environmental governance; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; GOVERNANCE; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12267
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Community-based rangeland management (CBRM) has been promoted as a promising option for achieving both rangeland conservation and community well-being. However, research on its effectiveness is limited, and the reported outcomes are mixed, especially with regard to socioeconomic outcomes. We measured social outcomes of CBRM in Mongolia by comparing 77 formally organized pastoral groups with 65 traditional herder neighborhoods across four ecological zones. We used household surveys, focus groups, and interviews to measure livelihoods, social capital, and management behavior. Members of CBRM groups were significantly more proactive in addressing resource management issues and used more traditional and innovative rangeland management practices than non-CBRM herders. However, the group types did not differ in social capital or on most livelihood measures. Our results demonstrate that formal CBRM is strongly associated with herder behavior, but calls for consideration of how to reach livelihood outcomes, a key incentive for community-based conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 327
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The evolution of the rangeland trusts network as a catalyst for community-based conservation in the American West
    Bennett, Drew E.
    Knapp, Corrine N.
    Knight, Richard L.
    Glenn, Erik
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [42] Coalitions for Landscape Resilience: Institutional Dynamics behind Community-Based Rangeland Management System in North-Western Tanzania
    Eilola, Salla
    Duguma, Lalisa
    Kayhko, Niina
    Minang, Peter A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [43] Challenges and opportunities with social inclusion and community-based water management in Solomon Islands
    Love, Mark William
    Beal, Cara
    Gonzalez, Diana
    Hagabore, Joe
    Benjamin, Collin
    Bugoro, Hugo
    Panda, Nixon
    O'oi, Jael
    Offer, Carol
    Souter, Regina
    DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2022, 40 (04)
  • [44] Community-based forest management in the Philippines
    Johnson, TR
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1999, 97 (11) : 26 - 30
  • [45] Collaboration for community-based wildlife management
    Christopher R. Gaughan
    Stephen DeStefano
    Urban Ecosystems, 2006, 9 (3) : 259 - 259
  • [46] Community-Based Integrated Watershed Management
    Kennedy N. Igbokwe
    ChineseJournalofPopulation,ResourcesandEnvironment, 2005, ResourcesandEnvironment.2005 (01) : 60 - 64
  • [47] Community-based management of COPD in Nepal
    Gautam, Rupesh
    Neupane, Dinesh
    Karki, Arjun
    Kallestrup, Per
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (01): : E6 - E6
  • [48] Community-Based Resources for Concussion Management
    Crawford, Nannette
    Sirmon-Taylor, Bess
    SEMINARS IN SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2014, 35 (03) : 166 - 172
  • [49] A COMMUNITY-BASED QUALITY MANAGEMENT EFFORT
    SWIFT, JA
    1989 IIE INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONFERENCE & SOCIETY FOR INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1989, : 50 - 51
  • [50] Collaboration for community-based wildlife management
    Daniel J. Decker
    Daniela B. Raik
    Len H. Carpenter
    John F. Organ
    Tania M. Schusler
    Urban Ecosystems, 2006, 9 (3) : 261 - 261