共 50 条
Representation of Women on Plastic Surgery Journal Editorial Boards in the United States
被引:10
作者:
Pflibsen, Lacey R.
[1
]
Foley, Brittany M.
[2
]
Bernard, Robert W.
[2
,3
,4
]
Lee, Gordon K.
[5
]
Neville, Matthew R.
[6
]
Almader-Douglas, Diana
[7
]
Noland, Shelley S.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[4] Mayo Clin Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Mayo Clin Arizona, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Biostat, Phoenix, AZ USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Mayo Clin Lib, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词:
PRODUCTIVITY;
AUTHORSHIP;
TRENDS;
D O I:
10.1093/asj/sjab034
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: During the past decade, a growing number of women have pursued medical careers, including in plastic surgery. However, female physicians have tended to be underrepresented in a variety of leadership roles in their respective specialties. Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the representation of female plastic surgeons on the editorial boards of high-impact plastic surgery journals. Methods: The gender of editorial board members on 3 high-impact plastic surgery journals was evaluated from 2009 and 2018. The number of women on each editorial board was then compared with the number of board-certified female plastic surgeons (BCFPS) and board-certified female academic plastic surgeons (BCFAPS), a subgroup of BCFPS. Results: There were 555 unique editorial board members from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, and Annals of Plastic Surgery from 2009 to 2018. During that period, 72 editors (13.0%) were women. At the beginning of the study, there were significantly fewer female editors than expected based on proportionate representation of BCFPS and BCFAPS to all board-certified plastic surgeons (P = 0.007 and 0.007, respectively). During the study, there was a 177% increase in women holding editorial board positions. At study end, women were adequately represented on all 3 editorial boards compared with their population data (BCFPS and BCFAPS). Conclusions: During the 10 years of this study (2009-2018), editorial boards have overcome the underrepresentation of women on, and female plastic surgeons are currently adequately represented on the top 3 high-impact journal editorial boards.
引用
收藏
页码:NP914 / NP920
页数:7
相关论文